The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1329 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I will call for amendments to be moved or not moved later in the proceedings.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The first group of amendments is on qualifying individuals. Amendment 1, in the name of Keith Brown, is grouped with amendments 4, 4A, 4B, 13, 6, 7, 14 and 8.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I ask Pam Duncan-Glancy to speak to amendment 4A and the other amendments in the group.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
For
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 4A disagreed to.
Amendment 4B moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Good morning and welcome to the 13th meeting in 2022 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received no apologies.
We are joined today by Richard Leonard MSP and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans, Keith Brown MSP, and I welcome both to the meeting. I also welcome those who have joined us in the public gallery.
Our sole agenda item is stage 2 consideration of the Miners’ Strike (Pardons) (Scotland) Bill. Members should have a copy of the marshalled list and the groupings for debate.
I aim to complete our consideration of stage 2 amendments today. If votes are required, I will call for yes votes first of all, then for no votes and then for abstentions. Clerks will collate the votes and pass the results to me to read out and confirm. We will take the stage 2 process slowly so that we have time to manage it properly.
I remind the cabinet secretary’s officials that they cannot address the meeting at this stage, although they can communicate directly with the cabinet secretary. Finally, I ask everyone around the table and in the public gallery to ensure that their electronic devices are switched to silent mode.
I hope that that is all clear. Let us make a start.
I should say that, at the bill’s introduction, the Presiding Officer determined that a financial resolution was not required. However, under rule 9.12.6C, the Presiding Officer has determined that the costs associated with amendment 16 would exceed the current threshold for a bill to require a financial resolution. As far as our stage 2 proceedings are concerned, therefore, amendment 16 may be debated but, in the absence of a financial resolution, may not be agreed to.
Section 1—Pardons for miners convicted of certain offences committed during miners’ strike
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Group 3 is on a compensation scheme. Amendment 16, in the name of Richard Leonard, is grouped with amendment 18.
I remind members that, under rule 9.12.6C of standing orders, the Presiding Officer has determined that the costs associated with amendment 16 would be significant in themselves. Therefore, amendment 16 may be debated but the question on it may not be put in the absence of a financial resolution.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The question is, that amendment 4B be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 14 disagreed to.
Section 4, as amended, agreed to.
Sections 5 and 6 agreed to.
Long Title
Amendment 8 moved—[Keith Brown]—and agreed to.
Long title, as amended, agreed to.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The second group of amendments is on qualifying conduct. Amendment 2, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 3, 3A, 9 to 11, 15, 12, 17 and 5. Please note that, as amendment 3 pre-empts amendments 9, 10, 11, 15 and 12, I cannot call those amendments if amendment 3 is agreed to.