The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1293 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I will pick up on a couple of points. We invited Dr Cass to give evidence, but she declined and referred us to her interim report. It is worth noting that Dr Cass鈥檚 remit specifically relates to NHS England. Obviously, anyone can look at her report.
Rachael Hamilton and Naomi Cunningham made a point about taking specialist evidence on children, and Naomi Cunningham talked about lawyers. I suggest to anyone who is watching that they look at our evidence session with the Children and Young People鈥檚 Commissioner Scotland. Obviously, he is not a lawyer, but he had access to lawyers in answering the committee鈥檚 questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
That is why I am saying that anyone who wants to see the evidence that was given can go to the Scottish Parliament website, and they can obviously read the Official Report, too.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I have to be mindful of time. I am sorry, but Pam Duncan-Glancy wanted to hear from Sharon Cowan now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Naomi Cunningham wants to come back in. Please be very brief, as I need to bring in two more members, who might want to cover the area that you want to raise鈥攑lease do not widen the discussion too much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Okay, and Pam Duncan-Glancy wants to make a brief point, as does Rachael Hamilton.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you very much, David. We will start with Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you鈥攜ou are reading my mind. We need to be conscious of time, because members want to cover a good number of areas. However, we covered more than we expected there, so thank you for that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Folk were pretty brief; thank you for that.
We move to questions from Emma Roddick.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I do not think that there are any more questions for David Parker. Thank you very much; this session has been really helpful.
12:18 Meeting continued in private until 12:42.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you.
Before we start, I will make a short statement on some relevant developments in order to update members and people who follow our work. Today, we will hear from two expert panels as part of our stage 1 evidence on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. The committee had hoped to hear evidence from Professor Alice Sullivan in today鈥檚 first panel. Although she is not able to join us today, I am pleased that she has accepted our invitation and should be with us on Tuesday 21 June.
We had also hoped to hear from Dr Hilary Cass in today鈥檚 second panel, but she has declined the committee鈥檚 invitation. She said that she has published her interim report and referred us to that and other published statements that she has made.
The committee had also invited a number of respected associations representing medical professionals to give evidence, but several have declined the committee鈥檚 invitation to attend in person today. Some have agreed to give written evidence, which the committee will be able to consider as part of our stage 1 inquiry.
Last week, the committee heard from witnesses representing faith groups and secular society. Ahead of that session, as committee members are aware, the committee had approached a range of faith groups but, for a variety of reasons, some declined our invitation to attend last week. I hope that that provides clarity for people who are following the committee鈥檚 work.
As has been agreed by the committee, the clerks are working with a variety of parents groups to organise an informal evidence session in order that we can hear from parents whose children have transgender identity. The clerks are also trying to arrange for the committee to hear informally from people who have transitioned but who have thereafter chosen to reverse that process. The clerks will publish details on those sessions in due course.
I hope that that information helps to clarify some of the queries about the committee鈥檚 agreed approach to oral evidence sessions.
Under our first agenda item, we will continue to take evidence on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. I welcome our first panel: Professor Sharon Cowan is professor of feminist and queer legal studies in the University of Edinburgh鈥檚 school of law; Naomi Cunningham is a barrister at Outer Temple Chambers, and chair of Sex Matters; and Karon Monaghan QC is a barrister at Matrix Chambers. I refer members to papers 1 and 2.
I invite each witness to make a short opening statement.