The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1293 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 11 disagreed to.
Section 11 agreed to.
After section 11
Amendment 71 moved鈥擺Christine Grahame].
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Amendment 128, in the name of Sarah Boyack, is grouped with amendment 71.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
No other member has indicated that they wish to speak, so I ask the cabinet secretary to wind up and say whether she wishes to press or withdraw amendment 53.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
We have not gone past the vote on amendment 71, so let us run the division again. The question is, that amendment 71 be agreed to.
For
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The question is, that amendment 12 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
For
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The question is, that amendment 8 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
For
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 125 disagreed to.