The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1444 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
You all had a legal responsibility.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Iain Wishart talked about how difficult things were, and I get it, but you were faced with calculations saying that there is such a big deficit. Not to put that down and create a budget that tries to reduce that deficit is incredible. Iain, you talked about having to consult. Surely that should have been started in 2022 when you started realising that there was a deficit, and I guess that that is when you should have been starting to prepare the budget in order to square it.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Convener, I do not think any of us has been suggesting that this is easy to do, but I think Mr Watson has articulated why a budget would have been so important.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I will follow up on some of Colin Beattie’s questions, which covered some areas I would have liked to go into—that has saved me a bit of time.
Your report includes a lot of tables that are very clearly labelled as modelling. Those tables are often taken as expressing fact by others, but that is not the case. You mentioned exhibit 10, which is very clearly labelled
“modelled impact of behavioural change”.
However, we can look at some of the facts. Just yesterday or today, we received the figures for population increase in Scotland last year. Last year, the population of Scotland went up to 5.55 million—the highest figure ever—and most of the migration came from the rest of the UK. So, we are now seeing that, when folk look at the whole basket of changes in taxation and other life changes, the behavioural change is that, on balance, people are choosing to move to Scotland.
That is there in the population figures, but it is not reflected in the modelling that we are seeing from others. That is fine, because I guess that, sometimes, there has to be a cautious approach, but when would we see those figures coming through into what that population increase has meant in terms of more people living and working in Scotland and Scotland having a higher employment rate than the rest of the UK? We have a challenge in that London and the south-east are different from everywhere else—they are effectively overheated—so, when we compare Scotland with the rest of the UK, we are actually really comparing Scotland with that overheated part of the rest of the UK.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
It still sounds pretty incredible that you did not put something down on paper as an actual budget.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
This is a United Kingdom-wide issue, but it is being dealt with differently in Scotland and England, and the approach to regulation proposed in this bill is not the same as the approach being taken in England. Lynsey, what are your thoughts on the two approaches? Have we got it right here, or could we learn more from what is happening in England?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
That answer was helpful, Ms Wilson, because you have laid out the differences between the models in England and Scotland. We can discuss later whether the Scottish model is safer.
Moving on to Tina McCaffery, I note that you said that you represented practitioners across Scotland and the UK. Perhaps you can explain who exactly you represent, and then go on to talk about the impact of having different regulations in Scotland and in the rest of the UK.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Are you able to tell us what types of procedures you are concerned about that will not be regulated by the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
That would be useful. I think that the committee thought that some of those procedures were covered by the bill, so it would be useful to know what you think is not covered.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Lesley, would you like to add anything else about the differences between the two systems?