The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1329 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
We have certainly heard evidence from people who have said that that happened to them—they consented in theory to something that they now realise was torture. Peter Lynas wants to come in on that question before Pam Duncan-Glancy comes back in.
10:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
I think that Peter Lynas does.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Peter Lynas has indicated that he would like to speak. We do not have to hear from everybody on every question, but the witnesses can indicate if they want to respond.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
On the subject of legal language, I note that this Parliament struggled with the issues around consent when we looked at legislating on domestic abuse, and we came to a slightly different and more finessed answer.
Does Piers or Anthony want to respond to Fulton’s question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Anthony Horan wants to come back in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Dr Jones, would you like to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you both for your opening statements. I apologise for the fact that, because of my bad convening, we are running over time, but the evidence that we have been hearing has been quite extensive.
The first question is from Pam Gosal.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you for that powerful evidence.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Okay. As I said, we are slightly over time, and as no one else has a burning question to ask, I thank all the witnesses for taking the time to come along. Their evidence has been really powerful, as has all the evidence that we have taken.
I think it useful to highlight that, last week, in a safe space, the committee took evidence in private from survivors of conversion therapy. Therefore, as well as hearing from the witnesses today, we have heard from a range of people who have direct experience of conversion practices.
11:17 Meeting suspended.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you for those opening remarks and for the statement of reasons. The committee’s role today is to decide whether we agree with your statement of reasons not to consult. I have taken some time to look at the responses to the previous consultation. As you mentioned, a lot of them involve people telling their personal experiences, which is hugely powerful. I guess that one argument why the committee should accept your statement of reasons is that those experiences stand and, as you said, if you were to consult again, you would hear the same stories again. That is almost certainly true.
However, one purpose of consultation is to guide the drafting of proposed legislation. What timescales are you working to in bringing a bill to the Parliament? As part of that process, even if you did not formally re-consult, how would you get views from people with lived experience on the specifics of delivery rather than hear their very important life experiences?