The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1329 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I call Pam Gosal.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Men in particular always need to be mindful of the last point that Sara Medel Jim茅nez made, because sometimes discrimination is not conscious, but that does not make it okay.
I hugely thank everyone for coming to the meeting and giving us a little bit more of your time than you had agreed to. The session has been really helpful.
We will now move into private session.
11:53 Meeting continued in private until 12:30.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you very much. The boys club is something that we all need to be very alert to in daily life. Sometimes, it is not a deliberate thing, but you make a good point there.
I thank everyone for their comments. We will now move to questions from committee members and a bit of a discussion. Members will suggest who they want to hear from first, but if anybody wants to respond to a particular question, they should put an R in the chat function.
Maggie Chapman is first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I see that Trishna Singh wants to come in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
I am just trying to keep some time for after each committee member has asked their questions, so鈥擺Inaudible.]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you for that and for keeping your response brief. We are tight for time, and members want to cover other areas, so I ask that we all try to be brief. However, I understand that we are covering big topics.
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
A few other folk have indicated that they want to contribute. I will take Megan Farr first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I will bring in our remote witnesses, starting with Judith Higson.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in session 6 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received apologies from Pam Duncan-Glancy. Fulton MacGregor and Karen Adam are joining us virtually.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take item 5, on correspondence from the COVID-19 Recovery Committee, in private. Do members agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Item 2 is a round-table evidence session on family law disputes between parents about the care of their children. I welcome Judith Higson, from the child and family law sub-committee at the Law Society of Scotland; Lesley Anderson, chair of the Family Law Association of Scotland; and Dr Marsha Scott, chief executive officer of Scottish Women鈥檚 Aid. They are all joining us remotely. I also welcome Ruth Innes QC of the Faculty of Advocates; Megan Farr, policy officer with the Children and Young People鈥檚 Commissioner Scotland; Ian Maxwell, national manager of Shared Parenting Scotland; and Rosanne Cubitt, head of practice for family mediation and relationship counselling at Relationships Scotland. They are joining us in person.
I refer members to papers 1, 2 and 3, and I invite each of the witnesses, starting with those who are in the room, to make a brief opening statement. I ask Ruth Innes to start.