The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2045 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful. Mr Macleod?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
I think that we all would, but I will leave it at that. Dr Robbie?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
My final question goes back to the idea of the £5,000 fine for non-compliance and where and when that can be levied. The committee has found a lack of clarity about that, so perhaps the witnesses can help us.
Proposed new section 44B(3)(c) of the 2016 act will require the land management plan to set out
“how ... the owner is complying or intends to comply with ... the obligations set out in the regulations”,
and proposed new section 44E will allow specific persons to allege a
“breach of an obligation imposed by regulations under section 44A”.
Is the drafting adequately clear to ensure that there are obligations to produce and to comply with land management plans? It sounds a bit like gobbledegook to me. I would rather have no one being fined because people are complying with good practice and everything is positive, but can a person be fined £5,000 for not producing a land management plan and then later down the line be fined another £5,000 if a plan appears but they are not complying with it?
I am also keen to know whether more than one £5,000 fine can be levied. Someone who does not comply with a land management plan can be fined £5,000. If three months pass and they are still not complying, can they be fined another £5,000? We are grappling with that. We will, of course, ask the Government to give some clarity about how those things might operate, but can Mr Macleod offer some assistance?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
Fergus Colquhoun and Gail Watt have not had the opportunity to comment. Does Gail Watt want to add anything?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is fine. I know that the convener has a line of questioning in this area, so I will ask just one more question.
I was a wee bittie surprised by the concerns that were raised in some of the written evidence about the cost of developing a land management plan. I think that Mr Macleod said that a lot of responsible landowners were already getting on with doing that, without the need for legislation. I would not have thought that, if the threshold was set at 3,000 hectares, developing a land management plan would be that burdensome or that costly in the greater scheme of things. I am asking whether that is the case; I do not know. In life, it is dangerous to assume things.
Do the witnesses have any concerns about the administrative burden and the cost of developing a land management plan? It is important that the committee takes a balanced view and that we get our witnesses’ opinions on that on the record.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
Your point is that doing the right thing is not burdensome.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Bob Doris
Do you mean as part of the land management plan consultation process?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
Bob Doris
Good morning, and thank you for coming along. To work out how effective the ask and act duty might be, it is reasonable to work out what the public bodies that are listed in the bill are currently doing. It is not about what they might do under that duty, but what they are currently doing. John Mills might be best placed to talk about that. What are those bodies currently doing, and what is their current relationship with local authorities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
Bob Doris
A lot of the points that you raised there will be asked about in later questions, so you should not think that I am ignoring the very relevant points that you made. I am trying to find out whether there are some individuals in the public bodies that are listed who already ask and act where they can. Is this about spreading good practice in a consistent way across all public bodies and across the country, or is this a departure from what currently happens with best practice?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
Bob Doris
I have a follow-up question for you, Annika. I will then bring in Maeve McGoldrick, in a second, to add to that. I apologise for not bringing everyone in, but I understand that there are time constraints.
Annika, do you think that the list of bodies in the bill needs to be added to?