The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2049 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Bob Doris
I nominate Michelle Thomson.
Michelle Thomson was chosen as deputy convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful. I think that NFU Scotland has commented on that area. Gemma, is there anything that you want to add? Is there anything missing that should be in the bill in order to get the balance correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
Can I check what you are saying? Is it your position that you are content with the balance that is struck in the bill, but on the basis that the relevant provision in the 2016 act is brought forward?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
Do you have any specific recommendations in that regard? This is a three-stage process, and we have stages 2 and 3 to come. Is there anything that is not in the bill that it would be advantageous to have in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful, Mr Ruskell. I suggest that we support the instrument, but that the committee should have an on-going role in due course to scrutinise the impact, which is important. Although Mr Ruskell and I may disagree on whether to support the instrument today, there is a common cause across the committee that this should not be a one-off act by the committee and that there should be on-going scrutiny.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
On the basis that the committee will carry out on-going scrutiny, I am content.
For
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Abstentions
Boyack, Sarah (Lothian) (Lab)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
Are we talking about a lack of clarity? Is that the issue? Are you content with the definition that is contained in the other bill, which was recently passed by the Parliament?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
That is very helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
Mr Ruskell makes reasonable points. On the question of whether, on balance, we should support the SI that is before us, I am minded to look at the cabinet secretary’s reply to the committee on 21 May, which says:
“The SI also revises and adds new conditions to substances in Annexes IV and V of the UK POPs regulation, which relate to the disposal of waste containing POPs. These proposed changes go beyond the requirements of the Convention and are designed to give certainty to operators and industry on their responsibilities when dealing with POPs waste.”
The SI goes beyond the requirements and gives certainty for operators and business, which is important.
Also, in the “EU Alignment” section, in relation to annex V, the notification document says:
“Therefore, while there is temporary EU misalignment, it is expected that the EU POPs regulation will also soon be amended in accordance with the Stockholm Convention.”
There is a temporary misalignment.
I am not seeking to block the instrument but, in allowing it to go ahead, we should ask for further information in due course on how the issue will be monitored by the Scottish Government and how realignment will be achieved. I do not dismiss or make light of Mr Ruskell’s comments, but I support the instrument as it stands.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Bob Doris
I did not take part in the scrutiny of the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill, but it appears from what you and Jackie McCreery have said that that definition could change over time, because practices change. Therefore, it makes sense to have the definition in a code or secondary legislation and to keep a watching eye on it. Does that not make sense?
11:15