The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2043 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful, Ms MacKean. I am sorry for cutting across you, but I am conscious of the time. We want to keep questions moving.
Minister, would you be minded to include in the bill a duty on the Government to continue to build those relationships? We cannot put a duty on the DWP, although I am glad that there is good work in practice, but we could put a duty on our Government to continue to reach out in such a way.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
Minister, that might be the advice that you are getting at the moment, but I am thinking about the legislation saying that the Scottish Government must engage in that way.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
Mr Westwater, you can squeeze in your other reply, if you wish, at this point.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
That is really helpful.
Ms Latto, the mood music that we were getting at our away day with the third sector was very much, “Yes, we’d like more money, but please free us up to do better with the funds that we’ve actually got”.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
It looks like there is broad agreement across the panel on that point.
Mr Bruce and Ms Ogilvie, if you have something specific to say that we have not heard already, please come in and say it briefly. Otherwise, I intend to leave my line of questioning there, but I assume that there is broad agreement among the witnesses.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
If anyone else wants to respond on that question—incredibly briefly, because I have another line of questioning—feel free to come in, but you do not have to.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Bob Doris
That really helps, because that is an acknowledgement that the lack of three-year spending reviews is a barrier to multiyear funding settlements for the third sector.
Mr Westwater, hold on to your thought, because I will ask my next question and, if you can squeeze your comment in during your answer to that, please do.
This question is not about the amount of funds that the third sector gets or whether there is multiyear funding. Irrespective of the funds that the third sector gets, we are hearing that the balance between core funds, restricted funds and project-only funds and a real lack of flexibility are putting at risk the sustainability of some third sector organisations and that we need to do better on that. Do you have any comments or reflections on what those barriers are? For example, do they include the lack of flexibility and not being able to vire some money over to core funds in order to do something innovative? I see you nodding your head, Mr Frew, so I will start with you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Bob Doris
I think that I have got certainty, because trading standards are content at the moment, but my question is inspired by the fact that there are a lot of technical regulations, and we have a lot of expertise in the committee clerking team and the Scottish Parliament information centre team to identify areas where the legislation can potentially be improved.
I will move on. Another thing that we have learned on the committee is what the WEEE regulations are. For anyone who is watching the meeting, I should say that they are the waste electrical and electronic equipment regulations. I also note that a UK-wide vaping product duty will be implemented in 2026. I would like to know about the interaction between the WEEE regulations and other potential fiscal measures in relation to these matters. Take-back schemes are still required in relation to vapes and vaping products, but I understand that compliance with them has been relatively low.
That is the general context. Has the Government thought about the interaction between the WEEE regulations, the forthcoming vaping products duty in 2026 and what we hope to move to legislate on this morning?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Bob Doris
Of course—absolutely.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Bob Doris
I am delighted that, in a few years, we will be in a position to scrutinise all of this anyway. It is a really positive step, but I am thinking about the future situation in which such vast sums of cash are, quite rightly, going to our local authorities, and I expect that Parliament will want to keep an eye on how that money is being used and on whether local authorities are getting a reasonable share of the overall pot of cash.