The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2043 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Thank you. That is helpful.
We know that the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 meant that the 2017 powers failed to exist any more. What is the current situation? If a large wind farm developer was seeking consent right now and wanted to do all the right things in relation to environmental considerations, what regime would they be operating under?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Sorry, convener鈥擨 have one final, final question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Prior to the 2017 regulations.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
I do, convener.
Good morning, everyone. I promise that there are questions for the other witnesses, too, but I will stick with Robert Black for the moment. I should say that I am conscious that we are not running an interview process here, Mr Black. This is an opportunity for you to put some stuff on the public record in the Parliament, as part of our role in this area.
What do you consider to be the key objectives and priorities for the post that you are possibly about to take on, and what will the key challenges be? I know that that sounds very much like an interview question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Pre-2017, we implemented decisions made at a European level. We did not make our own decisions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
There is an EU principle, and we build our framework for compliance around that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
Okay. The policy intent, then, is by and large to stay compliant with those regulations but to take the power to amend them as appropriate to changing circumstances. Have I got that right, Deputy First Minister?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
And my understanding is that there would be no lowering of the bar in relation to those consultation requirements, because we are sticking with the 2017 requirements, as previously outlined.
My only other question is about the concurrent operation of powers. It is quite reasonable for the Scottish Government to wait and see how environmental outcomes reports and regulations work in practice, and then decide whether to endure with environmental impact assessments for the longer term or to see whether there is better practice elsewhere and adopt that. However, the key point would be that the Scottish ministers would be in control of that decision. Would that be correct, Deputy First Minister?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Bob Doris
I will just make the point that this can be quite simplistic when the legalese is taken out of it, so I appreciate the answers.
Is it possible that the UK Government could pivot to environmental outcomes reports, which then became requirements on the Scottish consenting regime, as would environmental impact assessments? Is it possible that the Scottish regime could have two sets of standards that developers would have to comply with? That would concern some developers.