The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2049 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
The point that I am making is about whether it was self-evident that there should always have been a senior manager who was responsible for each particular section of the ship.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
That is interesting. I said that my question would be split into two parts. There has been preventative work to promote best practice and prevent unintended things from happening in order to raise the quality of land management plans, but I am conscious that we have spoken about the benefits and drawbacks in relation to only a very narrow list of those who can allege a breach.
Have you considered whether there should be an explicit power whereby the land and communities commissioner would have a mix of light-touch and deep-delve, proactive approaches to making sure that there is adherence to land management plans, for lack of a better description? They could randomly pull out five or 10 examples, without any breach having been identified, and go and have a look to see what is going on. Other regulatory bodies take a similar approach. The commissioner could take a risk-based approach to compliance with land management plans. If they become aware of concerns, whether they report them or not, they should perhaps have a duty to investigate them.
I suppose that, in asking that question, I am taking the next step in considering how the power might be exercised, but the heart of it is whether there should be a power for the commissioner to do some proactive investigatory work without the reporting of a breach.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
You are perhaps suggesting that there would be an implicit ability for the commission to do that, but not an explicit power. We might want to consider having an explicit power in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
I turn to Malcolm Combe. Should the provision say not only that a plan must exist and be complied with but that it should be of appropriate quality? I appreciate that that is a hard thing to measure. It would be easy, surely, to develop and to secure compliance with a threadbare plan, but that would not provide a qualitative approach to ensuring that the spirit of the legislation was complied with.
Is that section clear enough? How should it be changed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
If the current system had been in place years ago, do you think that we would be in the same situation now, or would performance have been better?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
Yes. I will leave it at that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
Okay. That is clear. Mr Combe, will you comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
Okay. I appreciate that. Calum, will you comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Bob Doris
I have no further questions, convener. I stress that I do not anticipate that most landowners would produce such a plan, but when we legislate, we have to legislate for not only the best landowners but those who might be remiss in meeting their obligations in that regard. It is important to put that on the record.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Bob Doris
I know that Peter Kelly wants to come in, but before he does that, I will be sneaky and ask a final question in this area. If I ask it now, our witnesses can respond to both questions and we can then move on to the next line of questioning.
Peter, if you have any reflections on Ms Smith’s question, it would be good to hear them, but I also have a question about the consequences of not implementing the act at a local level. I do not really like the word “consequences”, but is there a belief that the act is being implemented right across Scotland at a local level? If there is evidence that it is not, what should happen next? That is perhaps a better way of phrasing the question, but I know that you wanted to come in on the original question, too.