The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Bob Doris
I think that it would be. I appreciate that it is more challenging to measure the impact of the so-called less well-kent policies or the smaller, more targeted policies, but more information would be welcome.
I can suggest lots of different ways in which we could spend more money, cabinet secretary, and I am sure that you would say, “Where is that money coming from, Mr Doris?” It is important that we know what works, what is targeted and what can make a real difference. Any more information that you can provide on that would be helpful.
I have another question on that point. Do we do qualitative surveys with parents about what works? For example, the school clothing grant, free school meals and the best start grant might not turn the dial on child poverty, but they might change the lived experience of families. We heard some evidence of that when we did our child poverty inquiry; a lot of people who were not lifted out of poverty still had direct positive life experiences because of targeted interventions by the Scottish Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
So, at official level, Government officials were working with other Government officials elsewhere in the UK. I assume that those officials must have been updating Government ministers periodically and you were content that the process was a robust and transparent one in which the Scottish Government’s views were heard.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
I have no reason to believe that the scheme administrator will not do a very good job. However, fast-forwarding a few years, if we find that the Scottish voice is not being heard by the UK scheme administrator, what power is there for on-going discussion between the Scottish Government and the scheme administrator about tweaking things to ensure that the unique positions of remote and rural communities, island communities or local authorities are being heard at UK level?
11:15Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
It is helpful to be reminded of that.
I think that we have already heard the answer to my final question, but we can put it on the record again. Can you summarise any significant changes that have been made to the role of the scheme administrator compared with what it would have looked like under the previous Scottish system? I am not talking about glass. I am talking about other matters. For example, how will fees work for small producers? Has that changed under the new dovetailing scheme? Has the process for setting deposit levels changed? What are the differences?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
To allow the new fees to come into place.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
Okay.
I have one final question. Let us say that the process goes swimmingly well, the new fee regime is developed and the UK secretary of state says what they will do. If, at some point in the future, the Scottish ministers wish to lay further regulations to change how fees for ports are developed or to change what the fee regime looks like, will there be any recourse to the UK secretary of state or will the matter be fully in the hands of the Scottish ministers?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
So the only issue that we are talking about is whether there could be a gap.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
I should maybe ask a question about whether the scheme will recycle brass necks, which I think that we have seen in this committee recently. However, I want to ask about the scheme administrator.
The scheme administrator will be for Scotland, England and Northern Ireland. What was the Scottish Government’s involvement in the process of deciding what the powers of the scheme administrator will be and appointing the scheme administrator? We have heard about handling fees, the consultation requirements and some powers that the Scottish Government would have had under the previous scheme but that the scheme administrator will now have. It is important to know what that process was like and what the Scottish Government’s involvement was.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
A decision was made that it would be a single body. I know that the Scottish Government could have decided to have a DMO for Scotland, but it would have had to have dovetailed nicely with the administrator for England and Northern Ireland, so it was decided to have one scheme administrator. Are there any implications to be worked through in that? For example, rurality could have a significant impact on a deposit return scheme in Scotland, as we have heard already. Local authorities’ voices in Scotland can be projected strongly to the heart of the Scottish Government, but that might be more challenging at UK level. Also, the fact that we have island communities might have a certain impact on how the scheme operates.
Given that we will not have a specific administrator for Scotland, how can we ensure that all those voices are heard at the heart of the UK scheme?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
I want to ask about clause 42 of the bill. I am conscious that Nick Gosling might be the one who answers these questions.
First, can I get the factual situation with regard to clause 42 on the record? I notice that it provides enhanced powers for the Scottish ministers in respect of fees for harbour revision orders to allow recovery of costs associated with the handling of applications for port development. We are told that the Scottish Government is content with that provision. Would it allow the Scottish Government to have a new system for the recovery of fees, rather than the existing provision in the Harbours Act 1964, which I think that the cabinet secretary referred to? Is that the situation?