The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Should the bill deal with that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That would genuinely be helpful.
Mr Oates, you have been very patient. Do you have any comments or reflections on all of the above?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
And you are going to write to the committee with your thoughts on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That clarity was helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Could the bill be a vehicle for that? I suppose that it could be. However, there are tenants out there who have rights that date back to the 2003 act, and 10 years on from now, in 2034, there could be tenants out there who will have been farming land for 30 years. Another committee in 10 years’ time might think that they should have the protection of full resumption rights. Do you have any reflections on that, Hamish?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I want to look at the issue of resumption, which, according to my notes, is one of the bill’s more contested aspects. We will find out in this morning’s evidence taking.
Mr Hall, I think that I saw that you were the national president of the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, which thought that it was about time that compensation rights under resumption were reviewed. Perhaps, Mr Hall, you could say a little more about whether it is right in principle to review some of that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
All witnesses are nodding their heads, I think. Mr Wood, are you nodding your head?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
At this point, let us move on. I think that Hamish Lean, Martin Hall and Tom Oates were nodding their heads on that point.
I will bring in Andrew Wood first. I think that we have moved on to whether notice-to-quit arrangements should be included in the bill. So far, the witnesses have said that the bill should not include notice-to-quit arrangements. That brings us to where we are in the line of questioning, Mr Wood. What comments would you like to make?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Before I bring in Mr Oates, I should say that your answers have helpfully overlapped with all the other questions that I want to ask on this issue.
You said that the issue needs to be reviewed, but I think that your point was that the time is right to look not at fixed-term tenancies but at compensation for resumption in general, because things have moved on. I will not just regurgitate the model that I have in my briefing notes, as it gets quite complex, but you have said that there should be a review. Are you willing to put on record how you think that things should change?