The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
That is really helpful. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
So, you are comparing the quality of all six bids, but your belief is that all six bids will be of high quality. Then you have to determine what is best for the public purse.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I will give the briefest preamble to my final question. I do not doubt the good will and common cause in relation to the Secretary of State for Scotland, the Scottish Government or the CEO. I am not trying to be a fly in the ointment either; I am just trying to do my due diligence in relation to scrutiny. However, of course, secretaries of state come and go, cabinet secretaries come and go—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Is that on the basis of the routes that the ship is intended to operate on?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I have some very brief questions on the same front. The dead weight of 791 tonnes was the target in the contract. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
You are just going to check whether that was within the flexibility in the margins.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I would like to know where the restrictions are and where the ship can now be used. Are there more limitations on those vessels because of the current specifications, rather than the specifications that were set in the original contract? I am happy to get those details in writing but, ultimately, that is just numbers, and numbers alone are meaningless. What is meaningful is whether or not those two vessels can now technically do less if, at some point in the future, they were to be redeployed elsewhere to do other tasks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful, but I ask you to reflect on the basic point that I am making. Unless this is their bread and butter or their business, anyone listening to this meeting just wants to know whether the two vessels will be less effective on their current routes. We have a clear expectation that that will not be the case and that they will do exactly as was always intended, but they could be redeployed for other purposes within the fleet at some point in the future. Are there more restrictions on what they can or cannot do because of the variation in specifications?
Mr Hobbs said that there will technically be two fewer articulated lorries. That explanation becomes meaningful to someone, rather than the numbers that are flying about. It would be helpful if, either here this morning or in writing, we could get a meaningful explanation on that because, quite frankly, most people are just hearing gobbledygook. That would be helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. I do not want to pursue that any further other than to ask a more general question, which is not related to dead weight. After signing contracts for vessels to be delivered, is it normal or routine that those who win those contracts will, at some point during the construction phase, approach their partner and say, “We believe that there is a case for a contract specification variation,” and then seek agreement with those who have given them the contract in the first place? Is that unusual or is it routine?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Can you say a bit more about when that has happened in the past?