The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Good morning, everyone. I will come first to Dr Glinski with a specific question, but I flag up to the other witnesses that, in a moment, I will ask about how the benefits and entitlement systems in the United Kingdom and in Scotland could work more effectively, what they do well and what they could improve on. That is not the first question; I just want to set the context so that you can get your answers ready.
Dr Glinski, I want to ask you specifically about the fund to leave pilot, which ran from October 2023 until March last year. It was a £500,000 fund that provided up to £1,000 for each victim/survivor who took the plunge—it is a major decision—and left home. If the fund were to be introduced more widely, what changes would you make to it? What worked well in the pilot? The committee would find it helpful to get that on the record, and then we can look at the ways in which other systems can provide financial support. Could you comment on that, please?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
If a woman is seriously considering leaving an economically abusive relationship, they need to make sure that they are clear about their entitlements, and they need to be able to make a claim independently of the abusive individual, and to do so privately. There needs to be expertise, and there should not be a five-week wait to get access to cash. I am thinking about what an ethical and appropriate system would be. It could be totally different from what I have described, but, as the committee will have to make recommendations at some point, what do you think that an appropriate system would look like?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
It is very helpful that you have put that on the record.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
Moving on, I want to look specifically at the UK and Scottish benefits systems; perhaps we could deal with them a wee bit separately.
I do not want to put words in the witnesses’ mouths, but as well as looking at the way in which the UK system works, can you tell us what you think works well? It would also be helpful to have any clear points that you think need to change to better support victim/survivors when they wish to leave economic abuse?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Lyndsay, would you like to add anything to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you for those specific examples—they are helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you both. That was very helpful.
I have no further questions, convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
I am hearing voices saying that they support rolling the fund out nationally, reviewing the payment levels and ensuring that there is consistency and appropriate levels of awareness and signposting, but I am not hearing calls to fundamentally change the fund as it existed in the pilot.
Do you want to add anything on that, Stuart?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
I turn to Lyndsay Clelland. Do you have any suggestions for how we can improve the system in relation to Social Security Scotland or our local authorities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
For clarity, I agree with you, but I am thinking about the art of the achievable with regard to the recommendations that the committee may make.
I turn to the other witnesses. It is fine if you want to add anything about the UK system, but I want to ask you about the Scottish system. What improvements need to be made? I am thinking in particular about crisis grants and community care grants. Although there is no specific directive, by and large someone will have to demonstrate that they are without an income or are on a low income before they can access those grants. Of course, someone who is in an economically abusive relationship cannot always provide evidence for that, or they may not even be aware that they are in that situation. Changing the criteria for the Scottish welfare fund may be one way of improving the system in Scotland.
What works well, and what could be improved in relation to Social Security Scotland or our local authorities?