The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
My apologies, Mark. I did not mean to cut across you.
I find a lot of this quite abstract, to be honest. I have a concrete example—no pun intended—on construction, to make it real for me and my constituents. Four high-rise tower blocks on the Wyndford estate in my constituency were demolished. The break-up will be on site and almost all the demolished material will be used to build up to 400 affordable homes. Is that routine? Is that normal practice or do we have to do more of it, so that demolition and construction are linked? Quite often, where there is demolition, there is regeneration. Is that part of a circular economy, net zero approach to construction? I just want to make it real, convener, because otherwise, it is all very abstract to me.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
So, that does not happen now, but it is where we have to get to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
I will ask the question another way. It is fortunate that the new properties are being built and that the contractors are taking the reuse approach. If that had been a demolition-only job, is there a reuse hub in Glasgow that the material could have gone to? What would have happened?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
I want to ask about the ban on sending biodegradable municipal waste to landfill that is coming in this December. We are on track, apparently, to be ready for that, and I see from the committee paper that Zero Waste Scotland has commissioned a study on preparedness for it. I acknowledge there is also on-going consultation about biodegradable non-municipal waste. There is a lot of change in this area.
Do you have any comments on preparedness for the ban? I ask that you refer in particular to whether there are implications for the incineration of waste or for waste export. What are the intended and unintended consequences? Where are we on meeting the December target? Is that one for you to comment on, Jane?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
I can only refer to the committee paper, Iain, because I am not an expert on this. I am asking about the ban on sending biodegradable municipal waste to landfill by December. I am sure that that would be residual waste. If you have textiles and wood that has been put into a mainstream pathway for reuse and recycling and all that kind of thing that is not residual waste.
I am guessing, and the committee paper does do not say whether that refers to residual waste. The paper refers to biodegradable municipal waste that local authorities will be banned from putting to landfill by December.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
I come back to waste exports. Incineration is an appropriate pathway, but we should not be overreliant on it. Jane Beasley mentioned other potential solutions. What happens to waste when it is exported under licence? Are we just offshoring some of our responsibilities, or is the waste dealt with appropriately once it leaves Scotland? Obviously, there is a carbon cost to exporting it in the first place.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
I do not think that I mentioned in my initial question that the waste is not going to landfill, but you have answered appropriately. Biodegradable municipal waste will still exist—the challenge is finding pathways for it other than landfill.
I will come back to the issue of waste exports. Before doing so, I will ask about the incineration of waste. The committee paper says that the production of energy from waste will be over capacity in the years ahead. The committee paper says that the Scottish Government policy is that incineration
“should be thought of as a transitional technology that helps Scotland bridge the gap from mass landfill to a low waste, low carbon, more circular economy.â€
Do you think that incineration is a reasonable pathway? Might we become overreliant on that at the expense of other pathways? It would be helpful if you could tell us what those other pathways might look like.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
Okay, and you are leading on that for the Scottish Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
I am sure that they will do. Your points are well made. I do not want to get into the weeds of whether universal credit claimants should have a five-week wait in the first place—that is a highly politicised line. However, the fact that someone who is fleeing domestic and economic abuse should be immediately indebted, having struggled to make a claim while still in the abusive household, is a significant issue.
Dr Glinski, would you suggest that there should be a specific point of contact in universal credit or the Department for Work and Pensions whereby a woman—it is invariably a woman—who is seeking to flee an abusive relationship can have a private and confidential claims pathway for universal credit that would not involve a five-week wait so that they can get their ducks in a row before they leave the abusive household? I do not want to put words in your mouth, but the committee needs to identify conclusions as well as looking at the issues. Does that seem reasonable?