The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2222 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I welcome our second panel of witnesses. Michael Clancy is director of law reform at the Law Society of Scotland; Vicky Crichton is director of public policy at the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission and Kay Springham KC is from the Faculty of Advocates.
Before we start, I remind witnesses not to worry about the microphones because they will be switched on automatically, and do not feel that you have to answer every question. Simply indicate if a question is not for you—that is fine—and if you want to come in, please indicate to me or the clerks. We plan to allow approximately one hour for questions. Panel 1 overran a little.
I move directly to questions. I am conscious that the witnesses were sitting in the public gallery for the first evidence session, so you will have heard some of the first panel’s comments, and you will have seen the Official Report of last week’s meeting. Should a definition of framework legislation be agreed between the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament, and if so, why? How would a definition aid scrutiny? The first panel of witnesses discussed that a great deal. Could having a definition have any unintended consequences?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I thank the witnesses for their contributions. If you would like to put more comments on the record, please do so in writing after today’s meeting.
12:20 Meeting continued in private until 12:38.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Yes, if you would like to.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
That was helpful—thank you. Do you want to comment, Kay?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
From respondents who have sent us information, we have heard a range of views on whether there should be guidelines on when framework legislation can be introduced. What are your thoughts on the establishment of set criteria to govern when framework bills can be introduced?
Certainly, the submission from the NFU Scotland highlighted three points, which I will read out. It says:
“1) There is a need to deliver flexibility and adaptivity to mitigate possible future challenges.
2) Extensive work is undertaken with relevant stakeholders before and during the parliamentary process.
3) A clear indication of the overall required outcomes is set out by the Scottish Government.”
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Will you be keeping the situation under a watchful eye?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
First of all, thank you for the kind words and welcome.
I have two things that would be useful to put on the record. First, I chair Moving On Inverclyde, which is a recovery service that is in receipt of public money. Secondly, as I have indicated in the past in the chamber, my wife works part time for CalMac Ferries—I declare that for when CalMac and ferry issues arise in the committee.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you.
Regarding the 2007 contract and the legal advice that the board received—as with the convener’s question, you may not be able to answer this—did you find any information or explanation why the contract was not signed but was allowed to sit there until the end point was reached and the chief executive left?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful—thank you.
The report states:
“It is critical that all parties, Board members, senior management, staff and the sponsor team, work together to move the Commission into a stronger place in delivering its regulatory role while ensuring Best Value in the use of its resources.”
With those comments in mind, to what extent have the issues that you have reported on at WICS—and the efforts that have been required to address those issues—impacted on its ability to perform its regulatory role?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
It is fair to say that, given that the situation was unclear, the onus was on the board to clarify the position before moving forward with the contract.