The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2046 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring in Daniel Johnson, I will ask a supplementary question. I touched on this issue last week. This is a Parliament of minorities. The Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly are, too, which is in contrast to the UK Parliament, which tends, apart from a very short period of time when there was a coalition, to be a Parliament of majorities. On the suggestion of the potential to amend subordinate legislation, notwithstanding what has already been said, if that were to happen in a Parliament of minorities, could you foresee a situation in which the Government of the day finds it difficult to get anything done or to make any legislative changes, compared with a Parliament where there is an absolute majority?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Vicky?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
That takes us nicely to the next question regarding definitions. Last week, the committee heard evidence on whether there should be a definition of framework legislation, and it came across very clearly that that that would be difficult, because such legislation is a spectrum rather than something that is set hard and fast. That has helped to shape what the evidence sessions going forward will be. We also considered whether framework bills should be labelled as such when they are introduced in Parliament. Would labelling bills as framework bills be useful for stakeholders and help to improve scrutiny? If so, why?
I will start with you, Adam, since you went into this debate first.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I am sure that you could. [Laughter.]
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I welcome our second panel of witnesses. Michael Clancy is director of law reform at the Law Society of Scotland; Vicky Crichton is director of public policy at the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission and Kay Springham KC is from the Faculty of Advocates.
Before we start, I remind witnesses not to worry about the microphones because they will be switched on automatically, and do not feel that you have to answer every question. Simply indicate if a question is not for you—that is fine—and if you want to come in, please indicate to me or the clerks. We plan to allow approximately one hour for questions. Panel 1 overran a little.
I move directly to questions. I am conscious that the witnesses were sitting in the public gallery for the first evidence session, so you will have heard some of the first panel’s comments, and you will have seen the Official Report of last week’s meeting. Should a definition of framework legislation be agreed between the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament, and if so, why? How would a definition aid scrutiny? The first panel of witnesses discussed that a great deal. Could having a definition have any unintended consequences?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I thank the witnesses for their contributions. If you would like to put more comments on the record, please do so in writing after today’s meeting.
12:20 Meeting continued in private until 12:38.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Yes, if you would like to.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
That was helpful—thank you. Do you want to comment, Kay?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
From respondents who have sent us information, we have heard a range of views on whether there should be guidelines on when framework legislation can be introduced. What are your thoughts on the establishment of set criteria to govern when framework bills can be introduced?
Certainly, the submission from the NFU Scotland highlighted three points, which I will read out. It says:
“1) There is a need to deliver flexibility and adaptivity to mitigate possible future challenges.
2) Extensive work is undertaken with relevant stakeholders before and during the parliamentary process.
3) A clear indication of the overall required outcomes is set out by the Scottish Government.â€
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the second meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch to silent or turn off their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is to make a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take agenda items 5 and 6 in private?
Members indicated agreement.