成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 11 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2221 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

The result of the division is: For 3, Against 2, Abstentions 0.

The committee is therefore agreed. However, the member鈥檚 concerns have been expressed and noted on the record.

Do members have comments on any of the other instruments?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following instruments.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments not subject to Parliamentary Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 5, we are considering three instruments subject to the laid-only procedure, on which no points have been raised.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments not subject to Parliamentary Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

10:25 Meeting continued in private until 10:53.  

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 3, we are considering five instruments, on which no points have been raised.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 2, we are considering three instruments. An issue has been raised on the following instrument.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

No problem.

As there are no other comments, and notwithstanding the vote that we just had and the points that Mr Hoy has just made, is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 4, we are considering nine instruments, on which no points have been raised.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Stuart McMillan

You raise a number of points. Some of your concerns relate to policy issues and others relate to the route by which the instrument has been brought to the Parliament. Clearly, it would be for the relevant committee to put questions on the policy matters to the Deputy First Minister.

The regulations came up in the committee before we knocked off for the February recess. There were two options for the instrument to come to us. It could have come as a made affirmative instrument or through the expedited affirmative process. I agreed to the latter, so that there could be some dialogue with the committee and so that we could undertake our role better.

I am content with the instrument, given the opportunity that we have had to discuss it. The recommended action is that we do not draw it to the attention of the Parliament. If colleagues have any other comments to make, I am happy to hear them.

It is clear that there will be a division on whether we wish to make no recommendations in relation to the Health Protection (Coronavirus) (Requirements) (Scotland) Amendment (No 4) Regulations 2022.

For

Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
McMillan, Stuart (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP)
Sweeney, Paul (Glasgow) (Lab)

Against

Golden, Maurice (North East Scotland) (Con)
Hoy, Craig (South Scotland) (Con)