The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2046 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
With regard to the board, in your time as chair, has meeting every two months been enough?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
The Ferguson’s business plan refers to a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. I wanted a direct award, and I think that we all wanted that but, obviously, the Scottish Government did not do that, because of legal advice on the legislation that is in place—the UK Subsidy Control Act 2022. Was it wise for the business plan to refer to a direct award for the yard to do the work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
With regard to the condition of the yard, I have been in it many times over the years, and I think that it is fair to say that it was a working museum. The condition that it was in due to the complete lack of investment for many years made it a relic of a bygone age, to be quite frank. Notwithstanding the investment that has gone in and which has been touched on today, including the £14.2 million in next year’s budget and the £9 million being put aside from that, it is fair to say that additional and on-going investment will be required to bring the yard to a place where it can compete globally to win work. Would that be something that you would consider?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
I took the 60 and 40 per cent figures from the official report from the—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
I think that that 30-year figure is an underestimate, but what you say is positive to hear.
The one thing that is missing is work, in the form of orders. We will see what the situation is with the small vessels by the end of March. Clearly, we all want that work to go to Ferguson’s. There is also the SVRP 2 project, which involves three vessels. What else is in the pipeline? There was the BAE Systems work.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
I absolutely agree, and I think the fact—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
It might be useful for the committee to have a timeline. Clearly, the board meetings are online, and another three will be put on the Ferguson’s website. However, it would be useful for us to see a timeline for the committee and sub-committee meetings so that we can have a better understanding.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
Then the self-employed contract was in December 2022.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
According to Mr Tydeman, those two things happened at the same time—there was an agreement at the same time for them to happen.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
If you can send it over, that would be very helpful.
I have a final question, which is about the board. At the committee’s previous meeting on the issue, I asked about the fact that the board meets six times a year. To go back to an earlier point that you made, Mr Miller, I suggest that you were a wee bit conservative to say that there has been media coverage of the yard for six years, because clearly it has been 10 years plus—