The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 567 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
No—I did not phrase the question very well. Please carry on.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
If you do not have a figure right now, you can come back to us.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is absolutely fine.
I will ask another question. In your submission, you say that you need more funding for the private prison operator at HMP Addiewell as a result of contractual requirements. Can you set out, in as much detail as you can, the terms of the contract and what the additional cost will be?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Is that a consequence of the contract that was signed in 2006?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
When does that contract run until?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I turn to the submission from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. This question picks up on something that the chief constable spoke about and concerns the challenge of cybersecurity, which is one of the threats that we know about and which continues to develop and change. You cite it as a risk across the board, and state that
“the threat picture continues to grow”.
It would not be sensible to ask about specific incidents, so I will not do that, but how much of a challenge is that issue, and what impact does it have on budget requirements? That might not have been cited in the same way in the Crown Office submission, but it would be useful to understand the issue in relation to that organisation. I invite Mr Graham to respond first, however.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
It would be really helpful if you were able to find and provide the figures.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That would be really helpful.
I have a few other questions. The first relates to the written submission from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. You note that
“£5m in efficiencies are embedded”
within what you say is your requirement for the next financial year. Could you talk a little bit more about what that constitutes and how that might impact on your service and operability?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Perhaps Mr Logue or Ms Greener can talk about that from an organisational perspective.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
This is a question for both your organisations—I asked it of Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority last week. What has been the impact of the increase to employer national insurance contributions on both your organisations? Do you have the figures just now? If not, could you provide them later?