The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 556 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you. That is all from me just now.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
So, even though there is a perceived concern, you have no concerns whatsoever that the approach makes it less safe?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have another quick question—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That was helpful.
Clearly, this is a novel process, although it is not without precedent. I do not particularly like the terminology, but it is an example of the Henry VIII powers stuff that we have previously debated more widely. I, too, have not been a member of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, but I have had the pleasure of appearing before it, and have discussed many of these issues.
Notwithstanding the fact that this might be a novel way of creating a delegated powers-making process, can you clarify that any changes that might be sought would still have to come back to Parliament, and that, if they were more substantive, they would be subject to the affirmative procedure; otherwise, they would be subject to the negative procedure, under which the instrument in question could still be annulled? Will Parliament be able to accept or reject any changes in the usual way?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I understand and appreciate that, but the bottom line is that nothing is being done here that will create a new process whereby the Government can just put in place a rule without any recourse to Parliament. Parliament will still have the ultimate say.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I am not referring to a study. I am talking about our practical engagement with those involved in the selling of sex. At the very least, there is a perception that the bill would make the environment less safe. Do you think that that belief is held genuinely and sincerely?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Nonetheless, that perception exists, so what are you doing to try to ensure that that perception is minimised, to take care of those concerns as you take forward the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you, convener. I will stick with the theme, because our primary concern is the safety of women and girls who are involved in the selling of sex.
Ash Regan, you have obviously set out the principle and the conceptual nature of the purchase of sex as an act of violence against women and girls. I am the father of a daughter, and I understand that point, but what we are doing here is assessing the bill that we have before us and its practical impact. We have heard from a number of witnesses—and you have said that you have listened to every voice—who have said that the provisions of the bill would make the experience for women involved less safe. You have said very clearly that you do not think that that is the case. At a high level, do you think that that perception is wrong?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Did you say that it was a £400 million difference?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
We can broadly apply that across the justice portfolio.