The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 286 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I will quickly pick up that point, if I can. The average number of amendments per bill in session 1, when we were getting through legislation much more quickly, was 193. In this session, the number is sitting at 140.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Of course.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I know that you are not suggesting this outright, convener, but that would potentially lead to the conclusion that there should be fewer women appointed to Government. If that was the question, my answer would be a straightforward no—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
A collective one?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That speaks to Government effectiveness.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
By its very nature, it is a different pathway. I am sorry—do you mean, by contrast to being in Government?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Yes. By definition, it is a different pathway, because it is a different destination. Being a convener of any of Parliament’s committees is a big responsibility, which I know that the various conveners in this session of Parliament take seriously, as they should.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I first came into the Government when my party had a majority. Irrespective of that, I tried to work with colleagues across parties.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Again, I have to be careful here.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
It is for Parliament to determine whether there should be some form of systemic change to the formalised ways of working. Equally, it is for each committee to determine what is done under the current rules.