The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Are you saying that all contracts are for a year? Surely not.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I do not think that anybody argues that three or five-year contracts would be much more desirable than an annual contract. The difficultly always comes back to the problem of Scottish Government funding, which it gets annually, and it is difficult for the public sector to commit beyond that annual funding. It is a common and acknowledged issue.
You talked about the physical system being quite complex to access. Is that across the board, or are there examples of better practice that could perhaps be held up?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I am talking about the whole process in general. Are there examples that could be held up as being better than others, or is complexity a general issue because of the fundamental procurement system?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Pauline, I will pick up on something else that David Livey mentioned: the lack of consistency. How widespread is that? Is it a case of one sector doing it one way and another sector doing it another way, or does that happen because individual bodies are carrying out the procurement process?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I turn to Martin Rhodes. I am looking at your submission, particularly the report that you produced on the freedom of information questions and so on that you asked various public bodies. I was interested in some of the results. You state that
“public bodies have vastly different ... understandings of Fair Trade”.
That is a pretty sweeping statement. How vast are those differences in understanding and how do they come about?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Colin Beattie
As I said, I am not a lawyer, but, as I go down the list, the clauses seem to be very simple and straightforward and, from your report, it is quite clear that the HMRC is not complying with the SLA. It is okay to say that, in a couple of years’ time, we will have a real figure, but that does not say that it is timely or relevant information or that it is received by the Scottish Government in such a way and such a speed to enable it to discharge its duties in respect of rate setting, forecasting for SIT and all those other things. It is a fairly solid SLA, but it is not being complied with.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, do you look at performance against the service level agreement and compliance with the clauses that have been agreed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Do we know whether it is being done this year?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I am not a legal person. However, if you look at the SLA, you will see that, in clause 23 on page 5, the first bullet point says:
“HMRC will identify the Scottish taxpayer population and collect from it the correct rates of SIT to ensure the Scottish Government receives the correct amount of income tax revenue each year”.
Patently, it does not. Continuing on, there are another five bullet points about, for example, identifying and maintaining
“an accurate and robust record of the SIT taxpayer population”.
You cannot say that HMRC is doing that, or is it?