The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Beattie
So, we do not have any idea of when it will be.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. What are the implications of a delay in the roll-out of the GP clinical IT system for the plan to create a primary care data and intelligence platform by March 2026?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Beattie
I should probably declare an interest, in that I have met Dr Morrison previously in his capacity as a senior partner of a medical centre in my constituency.
I turn to the subject of information, which the committee has talked about in many iterations. Publicly available information for the Government is, in general, of extremely poor quality across the NHS, and it has been difficult to pull it together. The information on GPs in particular is not very good, and the impact of poor-quality and incomplete data on decision making and the use of public funds has frequently been discussed at the committee. If we do not know the outcomes of what we are spending our money on, we do not know whether we are putting the money in the right place.
What role should GPs play in providing that information and supporting improved data collection? I will start with Dr Morrison.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Dr Provan, I have become aware of the fact that we push pharmacists as a back-up for primary care. Pharmacists issue prescriptions, yet I am told that that aspect does not interface with the GP practice. That means that anything could be happening in the pharmacy, but there is no record of it.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
In your report, you highlighted the challenges that exist in recruiting board chairs, and you raised concerns about time commitments and pay, although I believe that there has recently been an uplift in remuneration. Will the changes, which will be phased in over four years, be made quickly enough or go far enough to address your concerns?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Is that not a red flag?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
I want to come back to the leading to change programme. Are you confident that it will address the challenges that have been highlighted? Could you give a bit more detail on that and its ancillary project?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, for quite a lot of years now, we have had concerns about the quality of leadership across the public sector, with, of course, specific concerns quite often arising about the national health service.
I note that your report lays out some issues with regard to recruitment. That is not a new thing; indeed, as far back as 2019, our predecessor committee called on the Scottish Government to take urgent action to address the leadership challenges across the public sector.
There are a number of issues in that respect. The previous committee looked at the apparent insufficiency of people putting themselves forward for, say, chief executive posts and so on, and at a round-table meeting that was held, there was a feeling was that there was a problem with the environment that some of these people were expected to be promoted into as chief executives and that that was a deterrent in itself. I do not know whether that was a valid statement; it simply came up at the round-table session.
Has that situation improved? Are there more people coming up who have the skills and ability—and, indeed, the willingness—to take on chief executive posts?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Given that this is a bit of an anomaly, what is the situation like in the rest of the UK? Are the issues similar? Is turnover of senior staff similar?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
You mentioned stability, which is tremendously important. Given the number of movements that we are seeing, is it not inevitable that some instability will feed into the system, given that so many people have taken up their posts over such a short time? Surely it will be difficult to provide continuity.