The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
What does that mean?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
What you are saying, in effect, is that the Scottish Government’s action of not approving the expenses triggered the section 22 report.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Why did you not retrospectively approve the expenses? In other areas that the committee has looked at, there has been retrospective approval of expenses, but, in this particular case, the decision was taken not to approve them.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will move on to a slightly different point. In response to a question from the convener, I think, David Satti talked about the audit and risk committee and the board approving the removal of limits per head for reclaiming expenses. If I remember correctly, that happened in January 2023, and it was for a trial period. First, how long was the trial period intended to be? Secondly, I did not understand the reference to oil prices and so on driving the change. That does not seem to be a reason.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
There is no real analysis of why. Those are significant movements within the broad bands. You would hope that HMRC would be providing some data as to how that has arisen, what the consequences are and where we are going with this. There is nothing behind it.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
I keep coming back to the point that using any assumptions, estimates or projections about the UK as a whole will lead to a big discrepancy, because there is such discrepancy between income levels in Scotland and those in the south-east of England, for example. That will distort every tax figure across the country.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
You do not do it?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Again, in self-assessment liabilities, it would appear—and I am interpreting this, so correct me—that the deduction of
“£57 million to estimate Scotland’s share of other relevant Self Assessment balances where specific data are not available”,
is presumably based on a UK-wide average.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
It is in paragraph 1.9. There are a number of other cases—I will not bore you by going into them one by one—where UK-wide data is being used. That has to be incredibly skewed because the south-east of England skews everything.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
I do not think that we are questioning whether it has done a good job. It is a question of its value for money as a stand-alone regulator.