The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Colin Beattie
Therefore, one could describe that as a pragmatic compromise.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
I am sure that there will be an appetite for that when the time comes.
I want to move on to fraud and irregularities around Covid-19 expenditure. Obviously, the two big business support schemes totalled nearly £1.6 billion. They responded quickly to Covid-19. Obviously, there was a need to get money to the right place at the right time very quickly, which opens up a higher-risk element.
I notice that the Scottish Government estimates that fraud and error will account for 1 to 2 per cent of those payments, involving approximately £16 million to £32 million. How does that equate to the figures that we see coming from Westminster, which are obviously on a bigger scale? We see estimates from there of £15 billion or more. Have we been better at it? Given that Westminster has had that experience, why are we better? Why is the figure not proportionately as high here?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
The logical extension of that is that until you know the whole picture, you cannot know whether all the estimates that you are making are particularly accurate.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
Local authorities are confirming to you the number of cases and so on, but you do not have information on what they are doing about them. You say that the authorities are pursuing cases vigorously, but you have no evidence to show that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, turning to a slightly different aspect, I note that the report makes it clear that the cost of running Scottish Canals exceeds the funding and income. Paragraph 11 says that, in 2020-21, the income was £18.8 million and the outgoings were £22.7 million, so there was a net negative of £3.9 million. What are your views on the financial sustainability of Scottish Canals?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
[Inaudible.]—there is something I want to ask. I was going to ask what the role of the external auditors was, because they must have been advising the board all the way along. Were they ignored? Did they not give sufficient advice, guidance or clarification? Perhaps Joanne Brown can give us a bit more information on that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
When Colin Cook referred to the value of the assets, he talked about their book value. Are we relying on that rather than their market value?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
So we are basing this on the book value of the assets according to the company.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
How often will you revisit the matter to ensure that the value of the assets has not been impaired?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay.