The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Colin Beattie
Moving on to something that is a little less sensitive, I realise that these are early days yet for judging the success or failure of the investments, but I am going to ask you just the same. You indicated that you have £191 million invested in 13 projects or companies. How were those opportunities identified, and what selection criteria were used in the decision to invest?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2022
Colin Beattie
As a matter of interest, will the recruitment process include the use of headhunters?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
If the Auditor General was able to ascertain that
“the Scottish Government lacked clear oversight of progress”,
why that happened must be evident and identifiable.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
Let us leave that aspect for the moment. I will move on to clarity of direction, purpose and outcomes. How are the various parts of the Scottish Government collaborating to agree the strategic intent and intended outcomes for skills alignment?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
I will continue with that theme. How does the Scottish Government plan to develop its letters of guidance to SDS and the SFC to reflect its expectations on how they should work together on skills alignment?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
I am surprised by what seems to be a bit of a downplaying of the role of the sponsor teams. Paragraph 19 of the Auditor General’s report says:
“However, over time, the Scottish Government lacked clear oversight of progress.”
Would the Government not have relied to some extent on the sponsor teams giving feedback during that period? Who should have been giving it the feedback that it did not get so that it lost oversight?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
There have been issues in relation to the working culture between SDS and the SFC. How are you working with them to agree how they will work together to deliver the shared outcomes?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
I have one last question. How is the Scottish Government ensuring that the objectives for skills alignment are consistent with other national strategies and plans, such as the future skills action plan and the coming national strategy for economic transformation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
Fundamental to success is strong, consistent leadership and absolute clarity as to direction. After the enterprise and skills review of 2016, the Scottish Government, SDS and SFC all committed to skills alignment. However, the Scottish Government did not provide the necessary leadership to ensure progress. My simple question is: why? What happened to leadership? Why was the Scottish Government not driving this, as was clearly intended in 2016? Where did the leadership go?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Colin Beattie
There is a recurring aspect in connection with the support given by and participation of the sponsor teams. They were involved in 2017-18 and then their involvement seemed to peter out. I know that the Scottish Government is doing a review of the whole sponsorship issue, but what happened here? Why were the sponsor teams not raising red flags, and who would they have raised them to?