The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
However, there is no intention to make mediation a mandatory step in the process.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Neil Rennick said that there is a requirement for local authorities to provide or make available mediation, but there is no requirement for that as part of the process. If the parents or whoever want to go straight to the tribunal, they can do that. Is that the most efficient way to do it? Surely mediation should be a requirement before going to the tribunal.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will move on.
Mainstream ASL provision has an impact on other pupils who are getting education. Has there been any evaluation of any impact on the learning outcomes for pupils who do not receive ASL?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I look forward to seeing the report.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I think that the document is good and quite strong overall, and it picks up on a lot of areas that the committee will be interested in. I will ask about one or two of those.
When the committee has discussed integration authorities with you in the past, we have always been concerned about the funding for them in respect of staffing and the commitment behind that, and we have heard anecdotal evidence that points to a possible unwillingness on the part of the NHS to pay its share into the IJBs. Can you tell us a bit more about the work that you are planning to do on the financing and performance of the IJBs?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
It would be useful to see the picture right across the board, as opposed to having snapshots of individual colleges. Those are useful and important, but we would like to see the overall financial health of the whole sector and to know what the performance is, because reporting is about performance as well as finance.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
That sounds fair enough. To move on slightly, fiscal sustainability is a big thing鈥攜ou touched on it earlier. I note that you intend to look at the tax policy and the opportunities and risks of using tax as a way to achieve fiscal sustainability.
There is a problem, of course, with tax, in that it is kind of one-sided. We do not have all the levers, and it is difficult to balance tax across the economy when we do not have that control. Can you tell us a bit more about your planned work on fiscal sustainability, particularly in relation to tax, and how it will support the work of the Parliament and particularly that of the Finance and Public Administration Committee, for which it will be of interest?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Certainly, the IJBs are key for primary and local healthcare, which are under increasing strain. It will be interesting to see what comes out of that work.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
As Graham Simpson has mentioned, I have an interest in my own area in the Musselburgh flood protection scheme鈥擨 do not know whether you have looked at that at all. It was a relatively small scheme that is now, depending on how many options are taken, costing well over 拢100 million, and Government finance appears to be uncertain, or at best indicative.
The scheme has taken about three years to get to where it is, mainly as a result of objections that were raised locally. The whole process has been quite byzantine in its complexity when it comes to things progressing through the system鈥攁nd, indeed, has been quite controversial, in that interested third parties have been part of the decision-making process. That has been subject to objections, too. I do not know whether you have looked at the scheme, but it is certainly one of the more complicated ones on the go at the moment, both financially and technically.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on slightly. You are going to produce a briefing on education and skills reform, which will help to inform, or to provide scoping for, audit work after the election. I have a specific question about colleges in that regard, because they have been very much in the news for a long time, particularly with regard to their fiscal sustainability, but I noticed that, in your plans, you talk about publishing a briefing in October this year. A briefing is not an audit, and yet the colleges are such an important element of what we are looking at. Is there a possibility of upgrading the briefing in order to take a more comprehensive approach to looking at colleges?
In previous parliamentary sessions, we have had a very comprehensive audit across the whole span of colleges, including all the link-ups between colleges and information on how they are all doing. Rather than seeing them one by one, we saw them altogether and could therefore understand the whole issue around colleges and what they face, because one size does not fit all and not all colleges are in the same state.