The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
On the transfer of services to NHS boards, which is a key element in the GP mix, did you identify any evidence in your audit of where the workload still fell to general practice, despite the responsibility for providing the service having moved to the local NHS board?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there any indication that the GP surgeries are prepared to give out that information?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
My last question is about GP head count. In paragraph 81, you say that there is not enough
“information about the number of hours worked by GPs”,
which seems extraordinary. Apparently, there is evidence that
“the average number of sessions worked by GPs”
was measured at 6.4 sessions in 2017 but that
“by March 2024, this had decreased to 6.2.”
That does not sound like a huge decrease, but if we multiply it across the country, it is perhaps a lot more significant. Given the pressure that GPs are under, why do we not know how many hours they are putting into the job? Why can we not evaluate that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on to the definition of ASL, which we have heard is very broad. Neil Rennick said at the beginning that it is deliberately wide. I am interested to know why its being deliberately wide is a good thing.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I come back to the basic question: if you do not know where the greatest need is, how do you know where to put the greatest resources? How do you do that if it is all in one big pot? You are relying on schools to somehow handle that locally.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Surely, if we drill down to understand where the more complex cases are, that allows us to plan ahead and to allocate the resources that are needed. If we just have one big, amorphous figure, it is difficult to know what resources are needed.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
There is one category that our local authorities would like to change, and that is autism. The spectrum is wide and it would appear that there are huge differences from one end to the other, and in the intensity of support that is required. Given that that category is one of the areas of most intensive support, would it not make sense to have a better breakdown and a better understanding of what is in it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I will start with a question about tribunals. There has been an increase in the use of the additional support needs tribunal by something like two thirds in recent years, which is an awful lot. As I understand it, there is no requirement for mediation to take place, so the parents or whoever can go straight to the tribunal. Is that an efficient approach? Should there be a requirement to first seek mediation before going to the tribunal?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
We hear about circumstances where some pupils who receive ASL can be disruptive, at times, in the classroom. Is there any evaluation of what impact that has overall on the educational outcomes of those who do not receive ASL?