˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2597 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“General practice: Progress since the 2018 General Medical Services contract”

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Colin Beattie

On the transfer of services to NHS boards, which is a key element in the GP mix, did you identify any evidence in your audit of where the workload still fell to general practice, despite the responsibility for providing the service having moved to the local NHS board?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“General practice: Progress since the 2018 General Medical Services contract”

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Colin Beattie

Is there any indication that the GP surgeries are prepared to give out that information?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“General practice: Progress since the 2018 General Medical Services contract”

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Colin Beattie

My last question is about GP head count. In paragraph 81, you say that there is not enough

“information about the number of hours worked by GPs”,

which seems extraordinary. Apparently, there is evidence that

“the average number of sessions worked by GPs”

was measured at 6.4 sessions in 2017 but that

“by March 2024, this had decreased to 6.2.”

That does not sound like a huge decrease, but if we multiply it across the country, it is perhaps a lot more significant. Given the pressure that GPs are under, why do we not know how many hours they are putting into the job? Why can we not evaluate that?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“General practice: Progress since the 2018 General Medical Services contract”

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Colin Beattie

Yes.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

I will move on to the definition of ASL, which we have heard is very broad. Neil Rennick said at the beginning that it is deliberately wide. I am interested to know why its being deliberately wide is a good thing.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

I come back to the basic question: if you do not know where the greatest need is, how do you know where to put the greatest resources? How do you do that if it is all in one big pot? You are relying on schools to somehow handle that locally.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

Surely, if we drill down to understand where the more complex cases are, that allows us to plan ahead and to allocate the resources that are needed. If we just have one big, amorphous figure, it is difficult to know what resources are needed.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

There is one category that our local authorities would like to change, and that is autism. The spectrum is wide and it would appear that there are huge differences from one end to the other, and in the intensity of support that is required. Given that that category is one of the areas of most intensive support, would it not make sense to have a better breakdown and a better understanding of what is in it?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

I will start with a question about tribunals. There has been an increase in the use of the additional support needs tribunal by something like two thirds in recent years, which is an awful lot. As I understand it, there is no requirement for mediation to take place, so the parents or whoever can go straight to the tribunal. Is that an efficient approach? Should there be a requirement to first seek mediation before going to the tribunal?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Colin Beattie

We hear about circumstances where some pupils who receive ASL can be disruptive, at times, in the classroom. Is there any evaluation of what impact that has overall on the educational outcomes of those who do not receive ASL?