The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
It is an extremely competitive area that has some really big players. There are a lot of questions about where in the existing market SNIB might fit—or, indeed, whether there is a place that it can fit or find a niche to take on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Based on what you have said, it seems that the bank is aware of those risks and is managing them, to the extent that it can.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I am a bit concerned about one particular area. Last year, witnesses told us that SCAD does not conduct horizon scanning of at-risk companies, sectors or whatever and that requests for support simply get referred back. You have referred, for example, to the enterprise boards and so on as being one of the conduits. Is that not a high-risk approach? If you are just waiting for things to come in, do you not risk missing critical issues out in the market?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I was interested in your reference to theatre groups, which I would never have linked to what you do. What are the criteria for getting involved in the cultural side of things? Is it the number of staff? Is it the impact on the local economy?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Although small in number, the existing investments are very diverse in terms of the skills and expertise needed to understand the businesses. I know that you bring in consultant expertise to manage that—and I will come on to the subject of consultants in a minute—but how much expertise do the people in SCAD have in the sectors into which your current projects fall? I ask the question, because you might be looking at dealing with other sectors outside of the limited number that you already work with.
Do you see where I am going on this? I am trying to understand how the people in SCAD get the expertise.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
The bulk?
11:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I am going by what is in the document, but the EY report states that
“the Scottish Government should formalise monitoring of companies of strategic importance in Scotland”.
You would expect that to be happening as a matter of course, but the response seemed to indicate that that was not the case—that is, that the process was happening more by referral than through proactive monitoring of the market.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I guess that there are arguments both ways on that one.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
The information that we have shows that requests for support come in from various parties—again, you mentioned the enterprise boards earlier. I think that you had about 40 staff at that time, but how many staff are actually engaged in the analysis of at-risk companies or sectors?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Colin Beattie
The one thing that I have not got a feel for is the sorts of volumes that are coming forward. You say that you have staff who are basically dedicated to that purpose. What sorts of volumes are they dealing with? Some companies might be quite complex, which could take up weeks or months of someone’s time. How many staff do you have sitting there, for example, at the moment?