The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Does the SFC manage that? How far does it monitor such activities?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
If these are separate subsidiaries, appointing their own auditors and all the rest of it, to what extent does Audit Scotland have an overview of what is going on under the surface?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
To be clear on that point, am I correct that Audit Scotland would not look at the audit reports on any company that has a majority of non-college related directors?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Talking of which, I had better get back on track with this particular issue. In key message 2, on page 3 of your report, you talk about the college failing
“to draw up and agree contracts for expenditure totalling over £900,000”.
How many contracts does that refer to?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes; they are mentioned in the plural.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Given what you have said, and given that your report confirms that the college acknowledges that the transactions “should have been reported” and that they were not, did the college give any reason why the absence of a contract had not been reported?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
It might be useful for the committee to see it.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I will begin with a simple question about paragraph 35, which says:
“The Bank’s ambitions extend to taking on a more active role in the private investment market.”
You write about “engagement” and “advice”, which I presume means giving advice, and about “investment arrangement activity” and “management of third-party capital”. Fairly wide-ranging skills are necessary to be able to do that. I have worked in investment banking and each of those areas is highly specialised. How will the bank bring together all the expertise to be able to support that ambition and how will that be balanced with its key role, as agreed with the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one final point, on which you might be able to provide clarity. The bank receives an allocation for year 1, but drawdowns happen over a period that crosses the annual budgeting period. Therefore, I presume that there are mechanisms in place to ensure that any unallocated capital issued in year 1 can roll over to year 2.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Financial transactions are not part of the block grant. They have to be repaid, and the obligation to make the repayments is on the Scottish Government. Is there a back-to-back agreement with SNIB in connection with that?