���˿���

Yes, because, as I hope we have demonstrated today and in my previous attendance in relation to the initial regulations, the roll-out has been well planned. We know what our anticipated caseload will be within the agency; therefore, any changes that have to be made to resources within the agency have been planned for.

An important aspect of how the agency operates is the fact that there are a number of different ways in which the workforce can move flexibly from one area to another. I appreciate that, in some areas, there are specialisms within those teams, but the agency is cognisant of the need to flex depending on what is happening. This is an exceptionally busy year for the agency—in fact, it is the busiest year that the agency will see going forward—but all of that has been planned out in the workforce forecasting that we have done, and we do not anticipate any issues.

We will, of course, keep a close eye on that. The committee will be well aware that I have kept a close eye on the work that I have asked the agency to instigate around processing times to make sure that those come down, because they were too long when we introduced the child disability payment and the adult disability payment. That situation is absolutely moving in the right direction, so I think that, importantly, we can reassure clients who may be coming to the agency for other benefits that there will be no disbenefit to them, because things have been carefully planned.

I do not have a figure for that to hand. We can certainly check, but we do not expect this to involve a change in the number of people who come forward. This is a change in dates rather than anything else, so it is something that we have already planned for.

I appreciate that it is not directly your constituency, but I was in Motherwell recently to speak to carers there about the difference that Social Security Scotland’s approach has made to them—both for them as carers and for those they care for. It was a fantastic opportunity for me to meet people and to hear not only about the further improvements that we need to make but about the difference that our approach is already making for people. That was a really useful event for me and my officials to take part in.

As I said in my opening remarks, the on-going work to raise awareness is absolutely vital in enabling people to have an understanding of what is happening and in taking away any stress particularly for those who are in the process of case transfer, who will know that there is no obligation on them to do anything. There have, therefore, been a number of stakeholder events for the roll-out, including online roadshows, and further roadshows are planned. So far, those have been attended by around 270 representatives from, for example, welfare rights organisations and carer support organisations—the people the committee would expect us to be in contact with.

From the roll-out date in June, there will also be further publicity through media, social media and so on to ensure that we get the message across in a generic sense but also particularly to those networks that are already trusted by carers and those they care for.

It is exceptionally important that the rules around backdating are understood and that it is clear that, if an individual is eligible for backdating, it is the agency rather than the client that is responsible for doing the necessary work .

The carers who meet the eligibility criteria for the carer support payment but not carers allowance and who live outside the initial pilot area will be able to have their award backdated to the pilot launch of the benefit if they apply within 13 weeks of the benefit being available in their area or if they have good reason for applying later. It is the same form, but, if there is a recognition in the form that the applicant is a student, processes within the agency will kick in at that point, so that the client does not have to do any additional work or provide any more forms—that will be taken care of by the agency.

Thank you, and good morning. The regulations enable us to commence delivery of pension age disability payment for new applicants from 21 October, initially in Argyll and Bute, Highland, Orkney Islands, City of Aberdeen, and Shetland Islands. We will then introduce pension age disability payment with one further phase before rolling it out nationally on 22 April 2025.

Our priority, as always, is the safe and secure transfer to pension age disability payment, which means that the rules for eligibility are broadly similar to those for attendance allowance. However, the passage of the regulations will enable us to take a very different and more compassionate approach to the delivery of disability assistance for older people.

Across all forms of disability assistance, we have heard time and again that the previous Department for Work and Pensions scheme is complicated and stigmatising and that it can be difficult to access. The recent proposals by the DWP are yet another example of the United Kingdom Government’s punitive approach to social security and we completely reject those heartless proposals.

In Scotland, we actively and vigorously encourage people to apply for the benefits that they are eligible for and we strive to make applying for them as easy as possible, supporting people at every step of the way. To that end, people will be able to apply in the way that works best for them, whether that is online, by post, over the phone or face to face, ensuring that no one is digitally excluded from the assistance that they are entitled to.

Our local delivery staff will provide one-to-one support, including assistance to complete application forms and take forward any follow-up actions. Establishing a third-party representative is being streamlined into the application process, which will mean that people who require that can gain support from friends and relatives from the outset, while maintaining their financial independence. We continue to fund an independent advocacy service that further supports people in accessing social security.

We are establishing a system that is rooted in trust with a focus on person-centred decision making. Where needed, Social Security Scotland will support people in identifying supporting information, or it will gather that information for them. As with our other disability benefits, when making a determination of entitlement, equal consideration will be given to all sources of information.

Applications from people with a terminal illness will be fast-tracked so that they can access the support to which they are entitled as quickly as possible. We will use our devolved Scottish Government definition of “terminal illness”, which removes the arbitrary 12-month timescale that is currently used by the DWP and allows us to get expedited help to those who need it the most.

The 160,000 people in Scotland who are already getting attendance allowance do not need to do anything. The regulations make provisions so that we can begin transferring their awards to Social Security Scotland and get them on to pension age disability payment. That will happen in phases from early next year. The process happens automatically and ensures that everyone will continue to be paid the right amount at the right time.

This is the fifth benefit transfer process that we have designed, and our processes continue to improve with experience. We have had good feedback from those whose awards have already transferred, with a significant majority of people in a recent survey saying that they felt informed and reassured about the case transfer process. Our approach for the regulations has been supported by the Scottish Commission on Social Security and many responses to our public consultations, and by our on-going engagement with stakeholders.

From day 1, pension age disability payment will offer an entirely new experience for older disabled people in Scotland; an experience that reflects the human right to social security and the ethos of dignity, fairness and respect, which is now firmly embedded in our social security system.

I welcome the opportunity to assist the committee in its consideration of the regulations.

I accept that that is how the system is designed at the moment, and we plan to continue with that approach. I go back to the point that there are different eligibility criteria for adult disability payment and for pension age disability payment. We are keen to ensure that we are not taking anything away from someone as they age. It is fair to say that people who are receiving adult disability payment before they pass to state pension age will still receive the specific rate of the adult disability payment mobility component as long as they continue to satisfy the eligibility criteria, because we do not want to take something away from someone as they get older.

I have met campaigners on the issue for many years now, since we first began discussing social security disability benefits, and I have always said to them that the Government is keen to look at what changes can be made. There are two areas in particular that we need to look at as we go through the process. One is the cost factor. I am happy to go into that in further detail when we talk about Motability, or we can come on to it later, but it is important that we have that on the record.

The other aspect is the ability for those who have a devolved benefit to continue to receive passported reserved benefits. Those are two areas—although not the only two areas—that we are exceptionally keen to keep in mind. We want to be open with stakeholders about the financial context that the Government is in, and we want to ensure that what might seem like a good idea has no unintended consequences, given that there may be a disbenefit if something impacts on passported benefits.

I would not consider it to be the single biggest factor, but it undeniably needs to be looked at. I consider the principles in the Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018—Mr Balfour was a member of the Social Security Committee when the Parliament passed that act—as our touchstone when looking at potential changes. I consider whether any changes will ensure that we still have a system that has dignity, fairness and respect, or how we can build more of that into the system.

I can, however, give examples of why cost needs to be looked at. The Scottish Fiscal Commission provided a full costing for pension age disability payment in its December 2023 publication, in which it estimated the 2024-25 expenditure to be £754.9 million, rising to £918.4 million by 2028-29. Costings for that financial year include a projected £87.1 million additional investment in Scotland when compared to the funding that is received from the block grant.

In some of our exchanges of a more combative nature in the chamber, Mr Balfour tells me that nothing has changed. I point out to him that the Scottish Fiscal Commission clearly thinks that something has changed, given that it thinks that PADP will cost us an extra £87.1 million because of the changes that we have made, such as the new terminal illness definition, the introduction of short-term assistance and the improved supported application process. Therefore, even making the changes that we have, which are in essence to do with not eligibility but how we run the system, has already built in an additional cost of £87.1 million.

We need to get past the case transfer process first. At this point, more of the conversations that we are having with the DWP are because of the changes that it is about to make to reserved benefits. For example, if the DWP, following recent pronouncements from the United Kingdom Government, reduces the ability for people with mental illness to qualify for personal independence payment, but we still have the same ability within ADP—which we are absolutely committed to—what does that mean? Does it mean that the UK Government would make changes to the way that it treats people who qualify? There is a real and present danger, given some of the recent pronouncements from the DWP on changes to PIP and to work capability assessments, so that is what the conversations have been on at the moment.

The member raises an interesting point, and I am grateful to stakeholders for discussing this area with me. We did not just discuss social security; we discussed other ways to support older people. Some of that is done through the transport system, and some of it can potentially be done in other ways. Mr Doris is quite right to point out that social security is but one way to support people and that there may be other ways to do that that do not come with the same eye-watering figure.

It is a challenging situation, given the financial constraints, but stakeholders have taken the approach of asking the Government to consider the matter in the round, and I have committed to doing that. I think that Mr Doris is also asking me to do that.