成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 914 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 September 2021

Bill Kidd

Can we write to the SQA to invite its comments on the proposal? Personally, I think that the significant numbers of our constituents who use BSL on a regular basis, including people who use it as part of their occupation, some of whom are interpreters, deserve the opportunity to be recognised in this manner.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I thank Christine Grahame for providing that depth of background. I find it difficult to believe, although it is true, that there are non-statutory child advocacy services, which I think is bizarre. I cannot see why any child advocacy service would have a particular, logical reason for being against regulation of its services.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 September 2021

Bill Kidd

It would be interesting to be able to make a judgment with regard to the costs involved in the project. Is the idea of the proposal to save money and put HIAL in a better financial position? I am concerned about the possibility that good-quality jobs for local people could be lost.

Another issue that is worth looking at is the safety of the remote tower solution. I am not technical, so I cannot grasp how the system operates over such a large area. The issue of the safety of the passengers, crew and people on the ground should be brought to the fore. I think that we need more information on the safety of the remote tower solution.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I thank Rhoda Grant for giving us that essential information. I was most struck by the fact that Dundee is available to provide such a service, but that is not being taken up. Making people who require treatment for tremors travel all the way to London causes them a great deal of discomfort, and it sounds as though it is a waste of money to do that when the treatment is available in Dundee. I think that we should get in touch with the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care to raise the issue and to ask why the facility in Scotland is not being used for Scottish patients.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 September 2021

Bill Kidd

We could write to the Scottish Government to seek an update on the outcome of the consultation, ahead of the independent review in 2023, which is a wee while away yet. It would be good to get an update on progress on the consultation and what is being considered in that, as it might answer some of the issues that the petitioners have raised.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I note that it is already possible for a court to override the principal limitation time limits where it is persuaded that it is equitable to the claimant and the defendant to do so. On that basis, the petitioner鈥攐r someone in her position鈥攃ould engage legal representation to approach a court and ask for the principal limitation time limit to be overridden in their case.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I think that that is a reasonable approach, because it is a matter of long-standing concern that still resonates today in some parts of the world, and it resonates with people in Scotland on the basis that injustice was done to a large number of people. However, as has been suggested, if we are to take the proposal successfully to the Scottish Government, a specific case or set of cases would provide a focal point that we could work from, rather than trying to take on all the cases of the large number of people who were affected over a long time.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I read the Scottish Government鈥檚 submission, which is comprehensive and looks to respond in a reasoned manner to the issues that the petitioner has raised, including the point about people at the very bottom of the economic pillar in society鈥攖hose who are homeless. It is important that we look to make sure that that has been done. From what I can see, the Scottish Government鈥檚 replies have been reasoned.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I very much understand the petitioner鈥檚 argument. I visited Culloden a few weeks ago, and I am aware that a lot of people in the area are talking about the persistent calls for development from developers. However, we cannot prevent people from lodging development applications. I do not think that we can take the petition any further, given that the Scottish Government has already said where it stands in relation to not allowing such developments.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 September 2021

Bill Kidd

I understand the point that Tess White has made. If a bird of prey is wild, and therefore lives according to its development and nature鈥攁s mountain hares do鈥攊t will certainly kill mountain hares. However, we are talking specifically about falcons being used to hunt mountain hares. Personally, having experience over many months of the campaign to save mountain hares, and having had correspondence on the subject sent to me, as an MSP, I do not think that the mountain hare is a species that can support that form of hunting.

It is perfectly reasonable for a bird of prey to kill in order to live, but I do not think that it is reasonable for that to happen specifically for the purposes of hunting. I think that that is the view that the Scottish Government put forward in its response, too.