The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Bill Kidd
I believe that we have to take the matter further. I would like the Criminal Justice Committee to be informed of the evidence that has been put in front of us in relation to the failure to bring the instrument into force properly.
I am concerned to read about psychoactive substances arriving, via different formats, for prisoners from outside. However, prisoners have human rights, and I do not believe that all their communications from loved ones outside should be treated in the manner that has been suggested. The matter requires further investigation.
I take on board the points from the SCCJR. At the same time, I think that we need to be able to see, following proper investigation through the Scottish Government, the actual circumstances. I do not think that we have been given that opportunity, so that needs to be looked at.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Bill Kidd
Do you believe that the systems that we have in place, and scrutiny by committees such as this one and the COVID-19 Recovery Committee, are sufficient? Could committees potentially be afforded an opportunity to progress their scrutiny in a fuller parliamentary debate? That would circumvent, to some degree, executive domination with regard to such powers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Bill Kidd
Thank you to both our guests. I will not take you back over everything that you have said, you will be pleased to hear. However, when Morag Ross QC spoke to us recently, she emphasised the importance of parliamentary democracy and the rule of law, and she said that there is a perceived increase in executive power.
Do you have any observations, not specifically about the impact of Covid, but about whether there is a more general shift away from legislative power towards executive power, and if so, why that might be the case?
In general terms, Covid notwithstanding, do you think that, among Governments in the UK, there has been a shift away from legislation being passed through parliamentary debate and the committee system towards executive power? Perhaps Professor Tierney could take that one first.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Bill Kidd
Thanks very much to both witnesses.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Bill Kidd
That is helpful鈥擨 thank you both.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Bill Kidd
I thank both of our guests for covering just about everything that I was going to ask about鈥攊n fact, they did so just a moment ago. I would, however like to re-emphasise the rationale for this committee鈥檚 role in the Parliament, because the purpose of scrutiny is to provide clarity of the message in law and to enhance that for us all.
Are there any possible transparency implications with regard to the use of the made affirmative procedure? Is there a danger that it might be used only to press home a political point of view, for example? I may be putting you on the spot, asking that. Is there a danger of that, and therefore a necessity that scrutiny should take place in committees before a made affirmative instrument is debated in the Parliament? Does that make sense?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Bill Kidd
Thank you very much for that. Dr Fox, do you want to add anything?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Bill Kidd
It may do no harm to raise the question of whether falcons and other birds of prey can differentiate鈥攐bviously, they cannot鈥攂etween hunt species and ask what the petitioner鈥檚 response is to that question.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Bill Kidd
I agree with my colleagues.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Bill Kidd
I have seen what the Scottish Government has said that its intention is, how it is approaching the matter and to whom it has spoken about it. Even so, it would not do any harm for us to write to the Scottish Government to ask for a review of the effectiveness of the current financial support that is offered to ensure that all occupiers have the capacity to meet the regulatory requirements and be kept safe. I think that there is still some confusion among the general public, and it would not do us any harm to do that.