The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 914 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
The instrument lays down the rules of procedure that are to apply in the local taxation chamber, which is a new chamber of the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland. The committee identified various errors with the regulations. First, that the preamble cites an enabling power that is not, in fact, relied on for making the instrument and that, if it had been relied on, would have required the instrument to be laid under a different procedure. The Scottish Government proposes to rectify this error by way of a correction slip.
Secondly, the committee also identified a number of cross-referencing errors in rules 20(4), 26(2)(i) and (j), 26(5), 27(1)(b) and 27(2)(a)(iii); a drafting error in regulation 26(2)(i); that the definition in rule 1 of “respondent” could be clearer as to the types of appeal to which it relates; and that rule 20 could be clearer as regards what expenses the tribunal can award. The Scottish Government has committed to addressing those points in an amending instrument before the regulations come into force.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, in that the preamble cites an enabling power that is not, in fact, relied on for making the instrument and that, if it had been relied on, would have required the instrument to be laid under a different procedure?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government proposes to rectify the error by correction slip?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Does the committee also wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h)—“meaning could be clearer”—in that the definition in rule 1 of “respondent” could be clearer as to the types of appeal to which it relates, and that rule 20 could be clearer as regards whether the tribunal may make an order awarding expenses as taxed or whether it can award only a specified sum, and as regards what expenses the award may cover, given the different provision in this regard made in subparagraphs (3) and (5)?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
The clerks are willing and able to put all this together, so could your officials put together some pointers and send them to us? You mentioned that it is not just this committee but other committees that are also considering such issues. If we could have some direction to satisfy the concerns of the members of this committee, that would be helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Under agenda item 4, we are considering one instrument, on which an issue has been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
The instrument transfers the functions of the council tax reduction review panel to the First-tier Tribunal and makes consequential amendments. The committee identified an incorrect cross-reference in regulation 94(3) of the Council Tax Reduction (Scotland) Regulations 2021, as substituted by paragraph 2(5) of schedule 2 to the instrument. The Scottish Government confirmed that the cross-reference is an error and proposes to rectify it in the instrument when made, as an error that could be corrected by correction slip. Full details of the error can be found in paper 3 on the committee’s web page.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, in respect of a cross-referencing error?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Does the committee wish to note the reasons for the breach and refer them to the lead committee?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Under agenda item 6, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Bill Kidd
Thank you for those opening remarks. I will kick off the questions before I invite members to come in.
In your response to the committee, minister, you acknowledged that much of the detail of the bill will be set out in secondary legislation. You also said:
“It is important that we obtain Parliamentary agreement to the principle of creating the NCS”.
Why does the Scottish Government consider that it is important to obtain parliamentary agreement at this point? Why is it considered necessary to obtain such endorsement through the passage of a bill?