łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 415 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Ofcom

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

Some do. You referred to the racist riots last year, which were sparked by online misinformation, propaganda and racism; they were quite deliberately stirred up in that way. Some people will tell the difference between truth and lies when they see it and some people will understand that social media content is not going to be honest or reliable, but others will not.

On your point about the responsibility of the broadcasters, this week the main regulated broadcasters covering a Reform Party press conference just broadcast its racist film about Anas Sarwar, uncritically and unquestioningly; the cameras turned to the projection of that film and it was broadcast to the nation on regulated mainstream news channels.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

I will move on to the recent announcement about qualifying criteria for regional production. There has been a broad welcome for that. Would you accept that it is, in a sense, an admission that the situation has been not always wholly honest in the past? For example, a report from Screen Scotland last year showed that of the top 15 “Scottish” producers by hours commissioned, only five were based in Scotland—two thirds of them were headquartered in London. Only two of the 11 suppliers mainly used by the BBC in that list were companies formed and headquartered in Scotland.

Is it fair to say that the way in which those issues have been handled in the past has failed to create the level of benefit and investment in a broadcasting and production ecosystem in Scotland that there could have been and that we therefore have to catch up a bit, which is why the changes are long overdue?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

I get the point, but part of the BBC’s purpose and value is to shape that landscape; it is not just to say, “We want to get the best ideas so we’ll go to a company that is based in London to do it”, but to say, “We want the best ideas to be coming from companies based here”. That is what you have the opportunity to grow.

Do you expect those numbers to be reversed as a result of the changes, such that two thirds of companies will be based here and occasionally you will use one that is based in London?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

But you expect the numbers to change to some extent as a result of the decision that was announced last week?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

I appreciate that it will not always be a like-for-like replacement, but there will be a strong expectation from the committee and from others that you are able to demonstrate that what is being created afresh will be at least as valuable in terms of those new opportunities as what you have decided to close.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

I could probably go further on that point for quite some time, but I am aware of time. We will have to come back to that as we see the effect of the decision.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

Good morning. Sorry, not sorry: I will come back to “River City” for a couple of questions first but then I will move on to the recent announcement on regional production.

You have said clearly that ending “River City” was an editorial decision and I accept that that was the motivating factor, but one thing that has left a bad taste in the mouth for the people who received that distressing news was their strong perception that they had been misinformed that the landlord wanted to sell the site for housing. If we can tie that off and put that issue to rest, I would welcome that. Can you confirm whether the “River City” team were told that? If they were not told that, how has the perception arisen that they were misled?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

I am not asking if you personally were responsible for where that suggestion came from.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

Was the BBC responsible for that?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

BBC Scotland

Meeting date: 29 May 2025

Patrick Harvie

It is a more modest change perhaps, then?