The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 415 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Some do. You referred to the racist riots last year, which were sparked by online misinformation, propaganda and racism; they were quite deliberately stirred up in that way. Some people will tell the difference between truth and lies when they see it and some people will understand that social media content is not going to be honest or reliable, but others will not.
On your point about the responsibility of the broadcasters, this week the main regulated broadcasters covering a Reform Party press conference just broadcast its racist film about Anas Sarwar, uncritically and unquestioningly; the cameras turned to the projection of that film and it was broadcast to the nation on regulated mainstream news channels.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I will move on to the recent announcement about qualifying criteria for regional production. There has been a broad welcome for that. Would you accept that it is, in a sense, an admission that the situation has been not always wholly honest in the past? For example, a report from Screen Scotland last year showed that of the top 15 “Scottish” producers by hours commissioned, only five were based in Scotland—two thirds of them were headquartered in London. Only two of the 11 suppliers mainly used by the BBC in that list were companies formed and headquartered in Scotland.
Is it fair to say that the way in which those issues have been handled in the past has failed to create the level of benefit and investment in a broadcasting and production ecosystem in Scotland that there could have been and that we therefore have to catch up a bit, which is why the changes are long overdue?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I get the point, but part of the BBC’s purpose and value is to shape that landscape; it is not just to say, “We want to get the best ideas so we’ll go to a company that is based in London to do it”, but to say, “We want the best ideas to be coming from companies based here”. That is what you have the opportunity to grow.
Do you expect those numbers to be reversed as a result of the changes, such that two thirds of companies will be based here and occasionally you will use one that is based in London?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
But you expect the numbers to change to some extent as a result of the decision that was announced last week?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I appreciate that it will not always be a like-for-like replacement, but there will be a strong expectation from the committee and from others that you are able to demonstrate that what is being created afresh will be at least as valuable in terms of those new opportunities as what you have decided to close.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I could probably go further on that point for quite some time, but I am aware of time. We will have to come back to that as we see the effect of the decision.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. Sorry, not sorry: I will come back to “River City” for a couple of questions first but then I will move on to the recent announcement on regional production.
You have said clearly that ending “River City” was an editorial decision and I accept that that was the motivating factor, but one thing that has left a bad taste in the mouth for the people who received that distressing news was their strong perception that they had been misinformed that the landlord wanted to sell the site for housing. If we can tie that off and put that issue to rest, I would welcome that. Can you confirm whether the “River City” team were told that? If they were not told that, how has the perception arisen that they were misled?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am not asking if you personally were responsible for where that suggestion came from.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Was the BBC responsible for that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
It is a more modest change perhaps, then?