The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3397 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I see that colleagues have no follow-up questions. Do you have anything further to add, cabinet secretary?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
What are the trigger mechanisms here? According to the consultation, the core funding provided by the Scottish Government for national parks was £20.9 million, and the core budget of the Galloway national park might not be as large as that required by the other two parks. However, given the context of finite resources, what will be the trigger mechanism that will determine for you whether a national park is the best course of action, compared with alternative ways or routes by which, as Maurice Golden and others have suggested, some of the benefits that it might generate could be achieved?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Our next petition is PE2116, lodged by Ellie Harrison on behalf of Better Buses for Strathclyde, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to improve the process for implementing the bus franchising powers that are contained in the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 by introducing, without delay, the regulations and statutory guidance that are required to give bus franchising powers full effect; amending the 2019 act to remove the requirement for proposed franchising frameworks to be approved by a panel appointed by the traffic commissioner, and instead empowering regional transport partnerships to have the final say on approving proposals; and providing additional funding to help support regional transport partnerships in preparing franchising frameworks and assisting them with the initial set-up costs once frameworks are approved.
We have assembled a galaxy of parliamentary talent this morning. I welcome to the meeting Neil Bibby, Patrick Harvie, Mark Ruskell, Graham Simpson and Paul Sweeney. We had also hoped to have Katy Clark with us, but unfortunately she is unable to attend.
For some of you—I am looking at Mr Sweeney—it is a return to familiar territory. I think that we have also had Mr Ruskell at the committee before, but it is Mr Harvie’s first appearance—during my tenure, at any rate.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Is that a potential future career option for you, Mr Ewing?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I call Paul Sweeney to speak on his written submission.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Well, there is a gap. Two recommendations were made and a delivery group has now been set up
“to drive activity relating to the recommendations.â€
I am content to follow up on progress in relation to that, Mr. Choudhury, if you would like us to do so. Do other colleagues have a different view? Mr Torrance has suggested that we close the petition—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
No.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I think that it is perfectly reasonable to invite others to contribute evidence to the committee, and I think that we are going to hold the petition open.
As a final thought, I might not usually do this but, if any of those who have addressed us this morning have any other suggestions of other things that they might like us to take evidence on, they should speak up quickly now. I am quite happy for them to do so. Mr Bibby?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree to consider the next two petitions together? I propose that we discuss each petition in turn, with a common suggestion for how we might go forward.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
You have nicely summarised some of the frustrations that we feel with the responses that we have received. Given the evidence that we have received and Michael Marra’s contribution, are there any suggestions from committee members as to how we might proceed?