The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3872 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Why do you think that those gaps exist? It is sometimes perplexing that a certain level of service, which seems quite critical, is available to people who present in some health boards but not to people who present in others. Is there any collective thinking between health boards to review the different ways in which they approach these matters, or do they very much operate in their silos and decide everything without reference to more widespread practice? To be fair, we see that issue with regard to some public transport options, which vary depending on which local authority is responsible. However, in healthcare, it is sometimes difficult to explain why somebody who is on the wrong side of a health board boundary feels that they cannot get the same level of service as somebody on the other side.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
In that case, I want to look at the centralisation of services, which has become a more common phenomenon in relation to the services that we provide. As you know, this morning, we are not discussing the petition on the Wishaw neonatal care unit, which the committee visited. Leaving that petition aside, how do you assess the centralisation of services such as perinatal care or the absence of services such as full abortion care or other specialised services, and how do you ensure that, in providing what, through centralisation, is arguably meant to be a higher level of service鈥攂ecause of the skill sets that are available鈥攜ou are not restricting access through boundaries that are then in the way of people who were trying to access those services in the first place? How do you ensure that centralisation does not physically restrict some people from being able to reasonably access a service? The matter comes up in the chamber time and again, and it is a common theme of a number of the petitions that the committee is dealing with.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 14th meeting in 2025 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. We have received apologies from the deputy convener, David Torrance, who is not with us this morning. We welcome his substitute, Marie McNair. Good morning, Marie. It is nice to have you back with us.
Agenda item 1 is a decision for colleagues on whether we will take in private items 5, 6 and 7, which relate to consideration of the evidence that we will hear, an anonymous submission and our work programme. Do colleagues agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The second theme is on diagnostic and treatment pathways. Marie McNair will lead us through those questions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We are interested to know what the productivity of the national specialist services committee is and to know not only how many requests it has considered but what the process is to determine whether such services can be provided.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
My mother鈥檚 bridge club meets quarterly, but that does not mean that it is very productive, and it is the productivity of these things that we are keen to establish. [Laughter.] She is in her 90s鈥攕he can hardly see the cards.
The committee is considering a petition on the regulation of private ambulance services. From petitions that we have received, it seems that these public-facing organisations should be subject to some sort of inspection and registration. That seems fairly straightforward, but why does something like that take such a long time to implement?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Very quickly.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The third of our thematic sections, which concerns capacity, skills and training, will be led by Davy Russell.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The next thematic section, which Maurice Golden will lead on, concerns the sustainability of funding and health service infrastructure.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to PE2116, which was lodged by Ellie Harrison on behalf of better buses for Strathclyde. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to improve the process for implementing the bus franchising powers that are contained in the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 by introducing, without delay, the regulations and statutory guidance that are required to give bus franchising powers full effect; by amending the 2019 act to remove the requirement for proposed franchising frameworks to be approved by a panel appointed by the traffic commissioner, instead empowering regional transport partnerships to have the final say on approving proposals; and by providing additional funding to support RTPs in preparing franchising frameworks and to assist them with initial set-up costs once frameworks are approved.
I remind those who are joining us today of the remarks that I made a moment ago about campaigning material, which seems to have quietly moved into camera shot during that short interval. I like a bit of pantomime.