The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I will bring in colleagues in a second. On the face of it, it looks as though the public information budget will be reduced in the next year. Is that correct, or is it now being allocated in different ways that might mean that the headline public information budget does not reflect what you expect to spend?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Okay, thank you. Colleagues, would anyone like to come in?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I have one final question that draws together a couple of points that I heard. It is a pity that there was never an annex D for the HS2 project which, I suspect, did not benefit from your foresight in capital expenditure planning.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I invite the clerks to give some consideration as to whom we might write in order to fulfil that objective. I am quite content with the suggestion.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We could add that question to our inquiry to those who have implemented the technology elsewhere, in order to learn how they have overcome those particular considerations. That might help inform anything that might happen in Scotland. We will do it that way. Are there any other suggestions? No. Are we therefore content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I should say that I have just been advised that Marie McNair was not able to join us after Alex Neil’s evidence, so she has not been with us for consideration of the other petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you very much. That was all characteristically candid. I am reminded of my old friend and colleague Sir Albert McQuarrie, who contemplated a return to public life and elected office at the age of 96. You could offer the country a lot more yet, Mr Neil, with at least three decades’ advantage on him.
That was very helpful. You have not only pointed the committee in directions that it might wish to explore further but identified ways in which we can try to take forward the inquiry. I think that you made the point that looking forward is actually the committee’s objective in realising the aims of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Welcome back. I should have concluded the previous evidence session by asking members whether they agree to reflect on that evidence and come to a determination on how we might want to proceed at a subsequent meeting. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
PE1986 was lodged by Andy Paterson on behalf of the help not harm campaign, and it calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to provide free testing kits for drugs in public spaces such as local pharmacies, libraries and university buildings. We last considered it on 22 February, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government, which, in its response, highlighted three forthcoming reports from the drug checking research project that all focus on the use of self-testing kits. It also notes that an implementation group has been established and that implementing drug checking will be a priority for the group. No specific timeline is available, as that is dependent on the Home Office and its licensing application process. Two of the applications were due to be submitted by the end of April and a third before the summer. Do members have any comments or suggestions?
I suggest that we write to the Scottish Government to request a summary of the key findings and recommendations of the drug checking research project’s three reports on the use of self-testing kits and to ask it to indicate whether the findings have altered the Scottish Government’s position on the free provision of such kits in public spaces.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content to add that to our list of actions?
Members indicated agreement.