The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3441 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That might very well be something that we can incorporate into our final consideration, given that the Government has said that it will engage with the petitioner on the aims of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you very much, minister.
We most recently considered the petition on 31 May, when we reflected on the evidence that we had taken in April from the petitioner and from Who Cares? Scotland, CELCIS, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland and The Promise Scotland. That was a striking round-table session, which persuaded the committee of the fundamental decency and drive of Jasmin’s petition.
I think that you have already answered this question but, to open the discussion, will you provide a clear assertion of where the extending of eligibility for continuing care and aftercare through legislation sits in the Government’s priorities?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
If Cara Cooper or Sarah Corbett wishes to come in, they should let me know. The minister may also invite them to come in.
I think that I follow what you are saying, minister. Through the listening exercise and the consultation, you are exploring ways in which the priority of extending eligibility for continuing care and aftercare could be realised or delivered. That may or may not be through legislation. Is that where we are at? Do you see there being a role for legislation or do you think that, through the work that you are doing, there might be another route to achieving the outcome?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
It seems a most unfortunate role—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, minister. We have listened carefully, and, in the comprehensive responses that you have given, a number of our questions have been answered without our having to put them, so that brings us to the end of our questions. Is there anything else that you feel that we might not have touched on that you want to add before we conclude?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. I agree that there is broader interest in the matter in the Parliament. Indeed, there was considerable interest when Stanley the eagle visited the precincts of the Parliament.
I think that we were disappointed by the evidence that underpinned the decision that was made and the digging in that we heard during the round-table evidence session that we held. We had hoped that the logic and evidence that we had heard might lead the Government to take a different position, but that is not the case.
When we next approach the parliamentary authorities in relation to committee debating time, are colleagues minded to seek to have a debate on the issue in the chamber?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We will therefore seek to do that and to highlight the issue more generally as a result. We will see what progress can be made in that way and take forward those actions. We had a well-informed debate on surgical mesh not long ago and then our committee debate on our report, but I expect us to have an opportunity for a debate in the chamber in the new year. Therefore, we will seek to have the issue of allowing mountain hares to be hunted for falconry purposes as one of possibly two short debates that we would take to the chamber on that occasion.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, thank you. Again, I would say to the petitioner that it is something that they and we should keep an eye on. I am conscious that not all cancers are terminal illnesses and that, therefore, a number of people might be excluded who might nonetheless benefit from the payment at an earlier point in their treatment. That issue is something that can come back to us at a later date. However, given the Scottish Government’s position, I am afraid that there is nothing further that the committee can do to take forward the aims of the petition. Are colleagues content to close the petition on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
As there does not appear to be any other suggestions, we will keep the petition open and return to it on receipt of responses to the points that Mr Torrance has proposed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
In essence, the response that we have received suggests that the particular cohort that was not vaccinated will receive general protection through herd immunity. Are our colleagues content to proceed on the basis of Mr Torrance’s suggestions?
Members indicated agreement.