成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3441 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

The petitioner shares that she was refused a smear test at the age of 18 after her first child was born prematurely and that, following a cervical cancer smear test at 26, it was found that she had abnormal cells.

The SPICe briefing explains that cervical screening is offered on a five-yearly basis between the ages of 25 and 64. The World Health Organization recommends that screening begins by the age of 35. Key organisations for cervical cancer advise that the risks of testing at younger ages might outweigh the benefits, as it is common for women under 25 to experience changes in the cells of the cervix that resolve by themselves. If those changes were detected by a cervical screening test, the patient may be offered unnecessary treatment that could lead to complications, including an increased risk of premature birth in future pregnancies. The Scottish Government鈥檚 response also notes that evidence and states that, along with the rest of the United Kingdom, it relies on advice about screening programmes from the United Kingdom National Screening Committee.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Does it give them a platform that they did not have before? That is what struck me as alarming. Material can be posted with impunity, because the young people who are perpetrating the violence are not of the age of criminal responsibility and it seems that there is nothing that anybody can do about it. In the knowledge that that is the case, they are repeating their actions. We heard of a series of videos of the same people identifying fresh victims whom they were then able to perpetrate that violence against. In a sense, it advertises the fact.

To give a completely parallel example, there is a quarry in my constituency that is popular with cliff jumpers. Every year, when the summer holidays come, young people come from around the United Kingdom and risk their lives jumping into the water in the quarry. Why? It is because, on social media, they have seen videos of other people doing it. That has advertised the fact and they have thought that it would be a great thing to do. There is no doubt that social media influences behaviours. The question in my mind is whether the impunity that exists and the lack of ability to do anything about the fact that violence is being promoted in that way should concern us.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you.

How do you gather your evidence from young people?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Of course, we are concerned primarily with the petitioner鈥檚 concerns, which are very much related to young people and, in particular, to the disturbing culture of youth violence in Scotland. In recent months, the petitioner has received dozens of videos, images and first-hand accounts of the violence perpetrated on young people.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Are we content to operate on that basis? At the same time, as we customarily do, we will alert the petitioner to the fact that, if the review does not advance the issues that they have identified, it is open to them to lodge a fresh petition at a later date. Do members agree to do that?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Would that be to pass on the petition, or is the suggestion that we close the petition but encapsulate the comments of the petitioner, as Fergus Ewing has suggested, in a letter to the minister, and that we write to the Social Security and Social Justice Committee highlighting the concerns that the petitioner has raised?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

PE1931 is about improving the reaching 100 per cent鈥擱100鈥攑rogramme roll-out by prioritising properties that currently have speeds of less than 5 megabits per second. The petition, lodged by Ian Barker, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent digital exclusion for rural properties and their households. We last considered the petition on 8 March, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government.

For context, Ofcom research found that 10Mbps of download speed was the minimum speed that is needed to meet an average household鈥檚 digital needs. That speed was set back in 2018. The Scottish Government response indicates that superfast broadband access has been made available to 62,000 more premises since 2022, and it states that the networks that are being delivered will support download speeds of up to 1,000Mbps. The submission also provides details about the Scotland full fibre charter.

Do members have any comments or suggestions as to how we might proceed?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Good morning, and welcome to the 17th meeting in 2023 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. Before we move to the substantive items on the agenda, I ask, under item 1, whether members are content for us to take in private item 4, under which we will discuss the evidence that we hear today.

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I am sorry, but that is the name of the petition.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Our job is to advance the petitioner. I am sorry, but I am not here to criticise the petitioner and neither are you.