The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Claire Baker
Good morning, and welcome to the 14th meeting in 2023 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Do members agree to take in private at this week鈥檚 meeting the evidence that we will receive this morning and our approach to the paper on the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc (Scotland) Bill and, at next week鈥檚 meeting, our draft annual report?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Claire Baker
Agenda item 2 is an evidence-taking session on the Scottish Government鈥檚 policy priorities, with the Cabinet Secretary for Wellbeing Economy, Fair Work and Energy. I welcome to the meeting the cabinet secretary, Neil Gray, who is joined by Colin Cook, director of economic development; Gary Gillespie, chief economist; and Nick Young, head of carbon capture, utilisation and storage and industrial decarbonisation, all at the Scottish Government.
As always, if members and witnesses can keep their questions and answers as concise as possible, that will be helpful. I invite the cabinet secretary to make an opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Claire Baker
Has that research been carried out by the Scottish Government, or is it independent? Does it take into account the Government鈥檚 approach to a wellbeing economy and the areas that we want to expand for exports or imports?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
Thank you. Other members will ask more questions about community involvement. Colin Beattie will ask the next questions; he will be followed by Colin Smyth.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
Good morning and welcome to the 12th meeting of the Economy and Fair Work Committee in 2023. I have received apologies from Michelle Thomson; John Mason is attending in her place.
Our first item of business is a decision to consider the evidence received during the just transition inquiry, and correspondence from the Public Audit Committee, in private at our next meeting. Do members agree?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
Cabinet secretary, we are concerned about the work that the board is doing, too, but we could not get anyone to engage with us here on what that is. We did receive a paper briefing, but we were keen to take evidence in person, so the board鈥檚 response has been a bit piecemeal. We appreciate that another official was due to come to this meeting, and we totally understand his reasons for not being here.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
I remind members that we are not the committee with responsibility for transport. However, I hand over to Graham Simpson for a short supplementary.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
I think that the committee will welcome that, given the commission鈥檚 quite detailed, 84-point response to the draft energy plan. If that engagement happens at an earlier stage, it might increase the meaningfulness of the draft strategies as they are developed.
I wonder whether you can reflect of the experience of Longannet. One of the reasons why our emissions have reduced is the closure of the energy plant in Kincardine, following which the just transition committee commented that, although there had been success in reallocating jobs, there was no evidence of any benefits coming to the local community. It also said that the local community had not been consulted. Are there any lessons that the Government can learn from what was seen as an opportunity for a just transition at Longannet that did not appear to be realised? I suppose that Grangemouth will be the next big place to go through a transition similar to what Kincardine went through, so have any lessons been taken from that experience?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
Before I bring in Maggie Chapman, I think that the cabinet secretary might be interested to know that we held an inquiry into town centres and retail last year. As some of its findings are relevant to Grangemouth, she and the team might want to have a look at our report.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Claire Baker
I have a couple of points for clarification. First, the committee has not heard from a representative of Ineos; we had a trade union representative from the plant, but Ineos itself has not given evidence to the committee.
Secondly, the committee was keen to hear from the Grangemouth future industry board, but our understanding is that it is not really a board but more of a forum. We were keen to engage with it on some of the issues that you have talked about, such as roads and planning, but it does not have representatives as such. In fact, we have struggled a wee bit to understand its purpose and how it relates to us as a parliamentary committee. The cabinet secretary seems to hold the responsibility for speaking on its behalf. Is that correct?