The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
I would also like to ask about the price of stamps. I think that I am correct in saying that it is Royal Mail that sets the price of a first-class stamp, whereas the price of a second-class stamp is still capped by Ofcom. At the moment, it costs £1.10 to send a standard first-class letter, whereas it costs 75p to send a second-class letter, which means that it is 35 per cent—or more than a third—dearer to send a letter first class. It seems that the price of stamps has increased quite dramatically. Do you think that the increase in price might be one of the factors in the reduction in the volume of letters? Particularly at Christmas, when we expect people to buy a high volume of stamps, there is a question whether £1.10 is still affordable.
We recognise that, in the UK, we have a very valued service, with a universal service obligation that other countries do not have. We also recognise that you reach every point of the UK, which is really important and is valued by people, too. However, there has been quite a big increase in the cost of a service that people regard as an everyday service, and the concern is that it has now become a special service that they use only on special occasions, because they are not prepared to pay the high cost. What consideration is given to such matters when you make decisions on the price of first-class stamps?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
But if it is a card for a special occasion, that could take five days. It is recognised that second-class delivery is slower. I know that three days is the target, but it seems to be the case that second class is now quite a bit slower than first class.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
As members have no further questions, that brings us to the end of this morning’s session. I thank both our witnesses for their evidence, which has been helpful to the committee.
10:49 Meeting continued in private until 11:11.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
Ofcom recognised that prioritising parcel delivery may have been necessary during the pandemic. Was it policy to prioritise the delivery of parcels over letters during the industrial dispute?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
But would Royal Mail incur a penalty if a parcel was not delivered in a certain timeframe?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
What if a company is asking you to deliver the parcel? If a person orders something online and the company cannot deliver it, it might ask Royal Mail to do it. Could the company impose a penalty on you if you failed to deliver it in the relevant timeframe, whether that was 24 hours or 48 hours?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
Do you not think that that decline is partly to do with the cost? This is very anecdotal, but I know older relatives who th ink, “I’m not going to send a card any more, because it costs £1.10. I’ll send an email instead.” I know that £1.10 is the third of the price of a coffee, but the issue is the perception that people have. The increase in price is encouraging the shift to alternatives. Maybe it is the pace of the increase rather than the amount that is making people feel that they are not prepared to pay the cost. Is that not discouraging them from sending things first class?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Claire Baker
Good morning and welcome to the Economy and Fair Work Committee’s 21st meeting in 2023. Apologies have been received from Colin Beattie, and John Mason is attending as a substitute.
I understand that this is likely to be Michelle Thomson’s last meeting with the committee. I thank her for her contribution to the committee and recognise the work that she has done on women in business and women’s representation, which are issues that the committee will endeavour to continue to highlight. I wish her all the best in her next committee.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take item 3 in private. Do we agree to take it in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Claire Baker
Will that loss—whether it is £4 million or £9 million—have any impact on the overall investment programme of the bank or is that manageable?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Claire Baker
Thank you. I bring in Jamie Halcro Johnston.