The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
Minister, I thank you and your officials for your time this morning, and I briefly suspend the meeting to bring in the next set of witnesses.
11:22 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you, minister.
Why have the regulations been drafted in such a way that they will come into force, in respect of the presumption, only if new primary legislation successfully replaces the emergency coronavirus acts? Could Harry Murray explain that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
If there are no further questions from members, we move to agenda item 4, which is the formal debate on the motion. I remind the committee that only members and the minister may take part in the formal debate.
I invite the minister to speak, if there is anything further that he would like to say, and to move motion S6M-02599.
Motion moved,
That the Economy and Fair Work Committee recommends that the Registers of Scotland (Digital Registration, etc.) Regulations 2022 [draft] be approved.—[Tom Arthur]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
I invite the committee to agree that the clerk and I will produce a short factual report on the committee’s decision and arrange to have it published.
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
I thank the minister and his officials for joining us today. We now move into private session for the remaining items on the agenda. I apologise—I was being too hasty. We have another Scottish statutory instrument to consider first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Claire Baker
That concludes the public part of the meeting. We now move into private session.
11:47 Meeting continued in private until 12:31.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Claire Baker
I have a supplementary question on that. I think that the target is that there will be 300 employee-owned businesses by 2030. We are making slow progress towards that. Are there interim targets to drive that change? Has the work of Co-operative Development Scotland, which is delivered by Scottish Enterprise, been mainstreamed across Scottish Enterprise? Is the option to change to employee ownership or a co-operative model always considered when SE is looking to support a business?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Claire Baker
That is helpful. Thank you. That brings us to the end of the evidence session. I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for joining us today. We will move on to our next item of business. I suspend the meeting briefly to allow the changeover of witnesses.
10:34 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Claire Baker
I appreciate the tensions and frustrations that have built up around the bill. I asked last week’s witnesses about that, and they suggested that some of the Scottish Government’s requests, such as the ability to veto, would be unworkable and unrealistic. The UK Government would argue that it will take decisions in the best interests of the UK and that it will take Scottish interests into consideration. Do your concerns about that relate to a lack of clarity in the bill? It sounds as though there is distrust of the UK Government in relation to the statements that it has made. Are you seeking assurances that the UK Government will behave in the way that it has outlined when it comes to consideration of devolved Parliaments and nations?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Claire Baker
You have talked about uncertainty because of the lack of guidance. Last week, although it was recognised that the bill could present opportunities for different subsidies within the UK, there was a concern that the uncertainty would lead to risk aversion, particularly in relation to whether public bodies decide to make any investments. Do you recognise those concerns?