The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 809 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
George Adam
I am happy with that, deputy convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
George Adam
From the universities’ perspective, given the way in which the funding works, they are trying to deal with the shortfall, so you can understand why that might be the case.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
George Adam
I agree, so is there a need for the SFC to have more flexibility?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
My parents killed it for me.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
Do you not agree with Stephen’s idea? Surely there must be something that you could look at to ensure that the people of Scotland get the opportunity to see what is happening in their Parliament. There is a lot more to it than some of us deciding to pick a fight with one another to create some good television.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
I am sorry to interrupt, but, to be fair, your team here is under pressure to hit those slots and to meet the required timescales. Therefore, something like Mr Kerr and I having a go at each other or a back-and-forth exchange is easier to show than the more nuanced discussions that we might have in committee. We are trying to make the point that the public can get access to what is happening at Westminster, but they cannot necessarily get access to what is happening here. We think that that is an issue.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
I will go back to some of the issues that Mr Bibby raised. I might have drifted off during one of your answers, but are we saying that “The Traitors” is still a Scottish production and is relevant?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
Okay. I would like to ask questions about television production later on, but I know that other colleagues want to come in.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
What I am trying to say is that, for me and my committee colleagues, the issue is about Scottish talent, Scottish technicians and everything that is involved in the whole production process.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
I want to follow up on the point about other independent media organisations that you work with. The Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster was told that IMG Media was an example of a Scottish production company. It produces thousands of hours of snooker coverage. Forgive me—my parents love snooker, but I cannot stand watching it for thousands of hours. However, that company is actually based in Chiswick, west London. Although it has a cupboard or something in Pacific Quay that it rents, it does not have any Scottish talent.
I come back to the issue of having to make decisions, which Hayley Valentine referred to. If we are spending money on getting that independent production company to provide thousands of hours of snooker coverage, why are we not doing the same for coverage of the Scotland football team?