The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 809 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
George Adam
I will ask similar questions to those that I asked the previous witnesses. I am still struggling with the transparency of the whole idea. You are here to represent two training organisations and an employer federation. In effect, you get a wad of cash from the Scottish Government and take your cut, but we cannot see what is delivered from that, whereas, with public bodies, we can follow the public pound, so you can understand why there is concern. I know that you have said that you are audited non-stop, but it is still a concern. You can sit here and tell me that you are super cool and groovy at delivering all these things, but we need to know the facts. That is still my concern after listening to everything that has been said today.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
George Adam
You mentioned that most of the UEFA funding will go back into football, which is what it is all about. As someone who is involved in the fan ownership of St Mirren FC, I understand that the major budget line comes from merchandise. Any unofficial merchandise is not of the same quality and it takes away from football.
We can understand that, when a big tournament comes to town, some will want to go down that route. That is not to say that I have not bought the odd flag from the hats, scarves and flags men. It is mainly them who we are talking about. It is not the burger sellers; it is the guys selling hats, scarves, flags and macaroon bars—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
George Adam
I do not know what macaroon bars have to do with it, right enough, but they are always sold as well. However, the main issue is really the hats, scarves and flags guys, because their merchandise is unofficial and they get moved on. The important thing is that the money goes back into football. That is what this is all about: generating funds for football.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
George Adam
Mine is, convener.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
George Adam
We tend to see them at St Mirren park only when we are near winning something. It is never much of an issue for us. [Laughter.] However, the serious point is that it takes away from those who are involved in football. We must be cognisant of that.
There is always a place for those individuals and I think that Glasgow City Council will find a spot for them. I can guarantee that, as you walk up to Hampden from various parts of Glasgow, you will hear the call, “Hats, scarves and flags”. At the end of the day, however, the crux of this is about getting money back into football. That is the whole point and it is what we are here for.
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
George Adam
I just had a wee look at what the process is in England. Apparently, the three-year cycle is a policy aspiration. If a school is rated outstanding, it is inspected every four to five years, a good school gets done every four years and there is full reinspection within 30 months if a school requires improvement. That is a good idea.
However, the whole point is that it does not actually happen every three years. It would probably work out similarly to the system that we have, in which we ensure that, when there is an issue, there is a process—we do the inspection and the school gets the support that is needed. That is almost exactly the same, because outstanding schools and good schools will be the ones that are—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
George Adam
So the proposal is not the same.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
George Adam
There is more flexibility for the employers to get what they want—is that what you are saying?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
George Adam
But that is what we are hearing from you today—a very strong argument for things remaining the same.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
George Adam
Given the figures brought up by my colleague John Mason—the fact that there could be 800 inspections a year—you run the risk of creating an administrative burden, with schools constantly under inspection and nothing getting done.
The evidence that we received from Professor Ken Muir from UWS—you have mentioned him on numerous occasions—was that the current inspection frameworks already provide sufficient flexibility to target resources where they are most needed while maintaining oversight of the system. He is someone who works in education and did a whole report on this and understands how everything works. Perhaps he would think that 800 inspections a year would be a bit much.