The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 796 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
It is very much a collaborative approach of working with your colleagues.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is very helpful. I turn to Mr Naylor to ask a couple of questions about HMICS. It has wide-ranging powers from the 2012 act, including the
“power to do anything that you consider necessary or expedient for the purposes of, or in connection with, the carrying out of their functions”.
How do you avoid those powers overlapping with those of other bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a very quick follow-up question. To encapsulate your point, Mr Ireland, you can see no advantage to your becoming an SPCB-supported body, as opposed to what you are. Do you think that that would make no difference to the independence of operation that you have?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have one last question. I am sorry that Jack Norquoy did not get to answer the previous one but maybe he can come in on this as well. The Scottish Government is considering moving apprenticeship funding from Skills Development Scotland to the Scottish Funding Council. Would that help or hinder how apprenticeships are supported? I see that Paul Sheerin wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
I will ask a slightly different question about funding for apprenticeship places, which is an issue that we have heard a lot about in evidence. I think that it was the SCORE Group that raised the apprenticeship levy at last week’s committee meeting. Many Scottish businesses are frustrated about paying the levy without it being transparent where the money goes. We were told that, particularly for businesses that operate across the UK, there is more transparency south of the border on apprenticeship levy money coming back and that the amount of money that they get per apprentice is much higher down south than it is in Scotland. I would be interested to get any perspectives that you have on that. Paul Sheerin is nodding, so I will start with you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
Does anybody else have a thought on what the barriers are?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
I will pick up on Lorna Slater’s point about graduate apprenticeships, which is a very interesting model that we have talked a lot about this in the committee. It seems that the opportunities for graduate apprenticeships and all the advantages that they brings are not being matched by the supply. Where is the barrier? Is it in the institutions? Anecdotally, I have heard that some universities are not very keen on graduate apprenticeships, as their preferred model is one in which only full-time students enrol; there are funding issues as well. Paul Campbell is nodding. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is me, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thanks—that is very helpful.
On funding more broadly, you have all highlighted experiences of apprenticeships being advertised and the number of applicants far outweighing the number of places. What is the barrier to offering more apprenticeship places from an industry point of view? I put that question to Paul Sheerin. Is it primarily to do with funding, a lack of capacity among employers or a lack of opportunities further down the track so that employers are not taking on people to undertake apprenticeships unless they see a future career path for them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
We heard a moment ago about some of the issues with colleges in Scotland. What is your experience of dealing with colleges in Scotland?