³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 24 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 924 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Disability Employment Gap

Meeting date: 1 May 2024

Murdo Fraser

It seems extraordinary to me that, one month into the financial year, you still do not know what your funding settlement will be. I cannot imagine how impossible it is to plan ahead.

Philip Ritchie, you were nodding throughout that answer. Do you want to add anything?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Disability Employment Gap

Meeting date: 1 May 2024

Murdo Fraser

Presumably, you benefit from being part of a large national organisation that has reserves, so you are not necessarily reliant on that very short-term funding, because you have something that you can fall back on.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

I have a slightly different question, which is about the provision of feedback to unsuccessful bidders. We were told that small businesses can find it discouraging when they put a lot of work into submitting a bid, the bid is unsuccessful and they get very little feedback on how that bid might be improved for future bids. Do you have any thoughts on how that process could be improved?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

That is helpful.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

I have a question on a slightly different subject. The procurement legislation has several thresholds: the £50,000 and £2 million thresholds; the threshold associated with the quick-quote system; and the £4 million threshold for community benefit requirements. Those thresholds have not changed since the act was introduced in 2014. Obviously, we have had inflation since that time. Is the Government giving any thought to whether those thresholds are still appropriate or whether they need to be reviewed?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

I have one more question. It is on the quick-quote system, which we have heard some positive things about from people who have used it. Do you know how many local authorities use quick quotes? Although I have not had a chance to verify the information, I was told that only three out of 32 local authorities use it. Do you have any knowledge of that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

Thank you, convener, and good morning, minister. I apologise for being a few moments late at the start of the meeting—it was due to traffic.

We have taken quite a lot of evidence from the business community about some of the challenges that they face in accessing public sector contracts, and I want to ask a few questions in and around that particular space. First, we have heard about resource constraints being a key factor, particularly for the smallest businesses trying to engage with public procurement. The committee has heard that funding for support services such as the Supplier Development Programme has fallen in real terms. What more can be done to assist businesses, particularly the smallest ones, that want to access public contracts but are struggling to do so, because of a lack of resource?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

Thanks for that. The minister mentioned the Public Contracts Scotland website. We have had some feedback that, although the portal is welcome, it is starting to feel dated and could be brought up to date. I know that there are plans potentially to retender and reinvent it, but what improvements would you like to see in a new portal to make it more user friendly?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 17 April 2024

Murdo Fraser

You said that the work on the portal is at an early stage. Do you have a likely timescale for its progression?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Bankruptcy and Diligence (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2024

Murdo Fraser

I should perhaps have put on the record earlier that, as is stated in my entry in the register of members’ interests, I am a member of the Law Society of Scotland, although I am not currently practising as a solicitor.

I have lodged a number of amendments that pick up issues that the committee identified in our stage 1 report. Some of those are intended as probing amendments, so I might not press them to the vote. Amendment 1 picks up the points that are covered in paragraphs 122 to 125 of our committee report and follows on from evidence that we heard from the Society of Messengers-at-Arms and Sheriff Officers about the time limits for serving bankruptcy petitions. We heard about the difficulties that those limits cause them, particularly in remote, rural and island communities—an issue that the minister has just identified.

My proposal, which is contained in amendment 1, is that the petition period be extended to 21 days. I have listened carefully to what the minister has had to say on the matter. I also note the commentary that Dr Alisdair MacPherson and Professor Donna McKenzie Skene of the University of Aberdeen have provided to the committee on the issue; they are more supportive of the minister’s approach, which is contained in his amendment 8, than they are of mine. Of course, I would always defer to legal experts on this issue. On that basis, I would be happy to support the minister’s approach and not move amendment 1.