The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 878 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Yes, but do you think that amending the bill to give clarity to that would be helpful?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Okay. That is very clear.
Sarah-Jane, I want to go back to your comment that you were surprised that the Scottish Government had—I think that I am paraphrasing—flipped the process and placed the obligation on the seller. Had it been considering that the process should be based on the purchaser?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Yes, we are getting into the weeds of how the system would operate, rather than considering the principle of whether there should be a transfer test or a public interest test. There would be greater transparency in being up front in saying that there will be a public interest test, rather than a transfer test, which is a bit non-specific.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Do you think that that was too high?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
You would be open to the idea of a longer-term plan rather than a five-year plan.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
My understanding of trying to manage land is that it is done over a long period of time. By its very nature, it is much more efficient and effective to do it that way. For example, forestry plans are for 15 or 20 years, and so on. Long-term plans therefore make more sense.
However, if you commit to the idea of long-term plans, consistency of approach is needed over a long period of time, which means that, if land changes hands or the land use changes, which changes the plan, that undermines the purpose of doing it over a longer period of time.
I hear the concerns about the cost that might be associated with that, which is why I am wondering whether making the plan for a longer period of time, while ensuring that the obligations that are set out in that plan are carried forward by anyone who takes over the land while the plan is being implemented, would help to improve land management in the long term and reduce some of the regulatory burden that it might create.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
You might not want obligations, but some people might.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I think that you are confused about what I am trying to get at. Perhaps it is the way in which I have phrased it to you. When I use the term “obligation”, you seem to be thinking about it from a legal perspective—that is, being legally liable to ensure that something is implemented. What I am trying to understand is whether you are clear about what a land management plan is, what it is there to achieve, how much value it has in the long term, whether there is a requirement for the plan to be taken forward and, if it is not taken forward, what the implications of that are. After all, the danger is that, if we do not get the four or five criteria correct, it becomes a futile process.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
What do you mean by “managed as a whole”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
What if you were the third-largest landholder or owner in Scotland but each of the individual sites that you owned did not trigger the threshold for a land management plan? Should such a landholder or owner be responsible for bringing forward a land management plan?